ZachMan wrote:
Edvalencia wrote:
ZachMan wrote:
Okay, so knowing what you know about KJs....would you pay $2k more for a 2005 than a 2002 considering they were equipped the same and about the same mileage?
I'd be hessitant to pay 2K more for a jeep that is 3 years older. Plus and '05 will probably still be under warranty. 02's only came with a 36K mile warranty.
Ed
The 2002 would be $2k less, not more. I was asking if its worth $2k to get an 04/05 over a 02.
Duh! Guys just aren't meant to multitask....
While the '02 has a few things here and there that the '05 does not, I think It would be wiser to get the '05.
Ed