The Jeep 2500 lights, the XJ guys didn't really like em but I figured I would see if the liberty guys liked them more:
| LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/ |
|
| Yah or nah: http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=58352 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Yah or nah: |
The Jeep 2500 lights, the XJ guys didn't really like em but I figured I would see if the liberty guys liked them more:
|
|
| Author: | BugginKJ [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Nah, it looks ok but they really don't go with the body lines. Just my 
|
|
| Author: | Tokyojoe [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Negative ghostrider, the pattern is full. |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
They look a little better when everything is nice and new: 
|
|
| Author: | STINGN [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
i seen one of those jeep 2500 in canada before. it looked cool! |
|
| Author: | teckman02 [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
they look better on the 97-01 xj's |
|
| Author: | ptsb5a [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Ummmm, No. Sorry, not diggin' it. STINGN wrote: i seen one of those jeep 2500 in canada before. it looked cool! What? Think you meant "cold". It's -34C with the wind. And WTF is a Jeep 2500? |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
ptsb5a wrote: Ummmm, No. Sorry, not diggin' it. STINGN wrote: i seen one of those jeep 2500 in canada before. it looked cool! What? Think you meant "cold". It's -34C with the wind. And WTF is a Jeep 2500? Wind chill doesn't affect inanimate objects. The Jeep 2500 is version of the XJ produced from 2003-present in china. Here take a look: http://www.colorado4wheel.com/content/Jeep2500.html |
|
| Author: | teckman02 [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
ptsb5a wrote: Ummmm, No. Sorry, not diggin' it. STINGN wrote: i seen one of those jeep 2500 in canada before. it looked cool! What? Think you meant "cold". It's -34C with the wind. And WTF is a Jeep 2500?  http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=ie7&q=jeep+2500&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rlz=1I7ACAW_en___US350 |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Enough different that I like it, looks stock or could be and enough to fool some into thinking you have a very special limited edition! or you can make up the story anyways, just like when people ask me, " I never knew they made a Kilimanjaro Edition Liberty" I have a long story to tell them about a very special model! 
|
|
| Author: | ptsb5a [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Sir Sam wrote: Wind chill doesn't affect inanimate objects. The Jeep 2500 is version of the XJ produced from 2003-present in china. Yeah no kidding on the windchill. Been living in northern Canada for a good chunk of my life. Thanks for the gen on the chinese XJ. Had no idea. |
|
| Author: | JJsTJ [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
looks ok w/ the red sheet metal, think they would stand out too much w/ lighter colors |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
teckman02 wrote: they look better on the 97-01 xj's They don't fit the 97-01's. only the 96-. the 97+ is totally different in regards to the tail light size. |
|
| Author: | Kingmick217 [ Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
JJsKJ wrote: looks ok w/ the red sheet metal, think they would stand out too much w/ lighter colors +1 |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Interesting, the general consensus even among KJ owners is less than favorable. |
|
| Author: | JeepinJarhead03 [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
I think the weathered paint just made them stand out too much as "new" which drew too much attention to them they look good, look like they fit pretty well |
|
| Author: | OldSkull [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
I actualy like it very much! Like Tom just said, it's look "Unique", are you gone mod the front end too? This is giving new life to a old rig! To bad the design don't fit the 1997-2001 but finding a nice 1996 in the USA is not impossible, up here in Canada with all the salted road in winter you need a miracle... 
|
|
| Author: | EAGLE01_2002Libby [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
Tint em and they'd be pretty cool 
|
|
| Author: | Blue KJ in PA [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
I like them on the red one...anything new of the gray one would look out of place as "weathered" as it is. |
|
| Author: | waywardtravel [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yah or nah: |
EAGLE01_2002Libby wrote: Tint em and they'd be pretty cool x2 If they don't after tinting, scatch'em up some. They look to new for me. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|