andycw wrote:
What are people's thoughts on the 2.5 CRD as there is one up for grab..
Andy,
if you find one that is good I would go for it.
These are the reason in my personal opinion ( your CRD2.8 don't start!!)
1) CRD 2.5 is the same engine as the 2.8 and came first, they rebored to make it 2.8 and to keep emission down added a lot more electronics.
2) CRD 2.5 weighs on average about 300 kg less than a 2.5, so less stressed.
3) consumption wise, if you don't mess with it (ie no lift or funny tyres) you can get up 28 MPG but on average 25/6 on a normal run, yes CRD 2.8 owners claim a lot more. Yes it's not as fast as a 2.8 top speed 100 mph, but who is in a hurry and the Norfolk Police love issueing point.... ( I am also a bikes)
4) CRD 2.5 actually lift probably better that CRD 2.8 auto, I have run a 3.5 inc lift for over 30K and a part from changing the front wheelbearing at 90K & 105K miles and a problem of allignment (to be expected with any KJ lift to a certain extent) that is all I have had.
5) if you decide to change and go for a CRD 2.8, I would save up a look for a good CRD 2.8 6 speed a lot better than the auto and less hassel with shudder from the transmition and problems with the torque convertor.
6) Most of all less electronics to go wrong, with the enginer light coming on on a regular base ( I spend a lot of time on Italian, Spanish & Germans forum andit's the same all over....)
7) If you have found one, make sure it hasn't been towning, it seams that around the 110K miles a lot of KJ the rear diff bearing go, I have come up a lot of post with this problem and new parts via the dealership are starting to be a real issue.
Hope this hasn't put anyone reading it off, it's aminly for 2001-2005.
I could carry on with more but...wrong post, and we are lucky compare to the US as we got more CRD to choose from over here.
Fil.