I see it as iffy
I totally get both sides
I'm a big CCW proponent
I also support revocation and prison for those who carry while under the influence
Sorry, when it comes to self defense, the lines can be cloudy enough as it is, without the defender having a trace of alcohol or any sort of circumstance that draws questions upon that persons level of judgment
The stipulations will probably chance to disallow carry on properties that have a purpose of existence that puts their purpose as primarily being alcohol vendors
I've always thought the regulations vs. restaurants and such that "serve" alcohol in addition to, primarily food, was borderline ridiculous
By good faith.. and some naive thought..
I think that reg. was put there to keep those under the influence away from those with CCW's rather than to "prevent" those with CCW's from drinking.
Responsible CCW behaviors primarily surround judgment issues.. which means no drinking
I've been to plenty bars without drinking, don't have to drink to have a good time - at the same time I'd rather hit someone with my fist or a chair if they're inebriated - and inebriated people usually make me want to commit that action without any provocation anyway..
but that being said, overall, I think I'd prefer to keep it restricted from locations that primarily sell alcohol -- allow it in restaurants as it's safer on you that it is in your vehicle but if you're going to a bar, leave it at home
let the owners / operators assume responsibility for that mess while you're on their property