kjhawaii wrote:
Hi, Ive been looking at how DC designed the rear suspension.
What Im tring to figure out is what keeps the axle from moving around under stress and torque. Partiularly Up and forward.
There are only 3 mounting points, 1 on top the diff with a single ball joint, and 2 control arms.
All of these are connected with flexable rubber bushings.
I had a couple of guys rock the KJ back and forth while I was laying under it and watching the rear suspention. There is a lot of movement in those lower control arm bushings and some movement in the upper boomerrang bushings.
What I think this all means, well
While a 3 link connection may had perfect geometry on paper, real life offroad conditions combined with rubber bushings, The KJ ends up with a loose sloppy rear wheel control.
If you are concerned about the rubber being too soft dont be we have guys running LT1's through locked axles with 5.13 gears and 36" iroks and they dont have any issues with rubber (very modified TJ's and YJ,s)
They use rubber cause it last way longer than poly it is quieter and cheeper I had LCA's on my TJ with poly joints and they sucked i got maby 8k out of them and they were shot
If you are thinking that a hiem or a all steel "ball joint" would flex better and also "give" less then you are correct they are less forgiving and flex better than rubber but they cost more you will have to fab whole new upper link deal and after you get all that worked out it will ride like c#$%
every bump that wants to push the axle back will just go right into the entire KJ rember that the KJ is a unibody so no frame to take the beating and body bushings to help smoth things out
You could go with a 1/2 and 1/2 type of set up with rubber on one end and a hiem on the other but the cost to benifit is just not there IMO