Dje Ryu wrote:
I never said that an OTT kit couldn't work, just extra work. No, I'm not pissed or anything. I just want people to be aware of what they're getting into. RRO implies, heavily, that no additional work will be needed with their budget lift, when they know that's just not true. And, for what it's worth, I have to disagree with the opinion that the Rusty's with a clevis is the same as an OTT. I'll get some pics of my setup, now with the clevis to compare to the OTT kit but for now, here's the problem I had with the OTT kit:

Make sure to put some poly or rubber between those to prevent that.
If you look back at my last post you will see that I said some were still getting some contact depending how far they raised the strut out of the clevis. So,I would bet for you to gain 3 1/4" of lift like I did,you would need more coduit nuts.And eventually if you raise it enough,you will have contact.I have'nt installed the RRO OTT lift,but mine is Rusty's OTT lift and at full droop I had about 1/4" between upper balljoint and coil spring.And to stay on topic,the original poster said they don't do any heavy offroading,just an occasional trail,but mostly road driving,so as long as they understand that the OTT is not for hardcore wheelin',then maybe this is all they need.Mine has been on since july of 2006,been off on easy trails 3 or 4 times,and I can promise you I have no paint missing on my coil springs,no leaking or blown struts,tight upper balljoints without torn boots,and even quiet cv joints.One thing I think we can all agree on is that the more you expect from IFS suspension,the more it's going to cost you.
Ron