| LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/ |
|
| Lift question, AGAIN http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=25532 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | WoodysKJ [ Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Lift question, AGAIN |
ARB Bull Bar, Stock 07 Limited. No winch and no plans, I think, to add one cuz I don't plan to get stuck. If I do, I will have a winch with Syntetic line, less weight. Back to the issue. ARB bull bar, no winch. OME suspension upgrade. Medium or heavy front end? Will I need any of these clevis lift do dads? If I go with the Heavy and no winch, are the issues with the fron suspension being TOO stiff? Opinion, facts and what ever please. |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have an ARB, no winch and Heavy Dutys ride out on the road is great not too stiff for me, Sean150 has rode in it and he can tell you how it rides in regards to his Rustys if that helps. ARB I think recommends the HDs as a matter of fact. Like I said it rides good, no droop, flexes well ( see pics in the Midwest site under Livingston Pics) easy to spot only ARB |
|
| Author: | WoodysKJ [ Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I knew that was coming the lift part question that is. OME and ARB recomend the medium for a bull bar and NO winch and the heavy for the full set up. They seam to imply that it is important to them that you do it that way. I do not see the need to buy a new set of springs if i find a deal on a winch. Personally, I don't think I will ever need one. When i wheel it is always with someone who has some sort of recoverey set-up. I will not however say that i will NEVER get one. That is why I am asking about ARB's and OME's recomendation to use the medium with the set-up i am planning. thanks Tom, lift party as soon as i can get the hardware, and the beer together. |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well I wanted a good heavy duty set up and plus if like you I ever find a killer deal on a winch I am ready if not I still like the ride! Tom |
|
| Author: | WoodysKJ [ Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This is another one of those topics I wish Troy would weigh in on. Thanks Tom. I am more than likely going to go with the HD spings and shocks, same price what the hell. |
|
| Author: | ARBSeth [ Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just ask the source... We suggest the medium duty 926's with no winch for the best possible ride and to maintain steering/clearance angles. You could run the 927's... but we don't suggest it because by OME standards, they ride a little stiff without the 80-100#'s the winch adds to the nose and our suspension engineers don't like how high it gets in relation to the Ball Joints and Arm contact without the extra weight on it. KJ's are picky about how high you lift them.. ball joints don't like it. By pounding down the pinch weld in the wheel well and running our Bull Bar, you can run a 245 tire with no rubbing. That's about as big as you can go. By running what we perscribe, you get the best ride with the most articulation possible out of the set up. Tinkering with it will net more lift, but you'll sacrifice ride and down travel in the process without any real gain. Make sense? Industry guy out. |
|
| Author: | WoodysKJ [ Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hey Seth, Where the hell have you been? Was hoping you wouldweigh in on this also. Since I saw your KJ on ebay i thought you bailed on us. So Option One: Bull Bar with weights (until I get a winch, If I get a winch) and the HD springs Option 2: Bull Bar and MD springs. and wheel with other who have winches. Sounds good to me. |
|
| Author: | elephantrider [ Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i have the arb with ome hd's in front ( no winch YET - got one on the way ) and it really doesnt ride that much stiffer from what i can tell. i run 265/75's on moabs for street tires, and there is no way i could wheen with those, you lose to much articulation, no room to stuff the tire. using cragar soft 8's with 31/10.50 bfg's are perfect with plenty of room for stuffing.
|
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jasonk I am with ya on the ride, I would not want my any softer, out on the highway its as smooth as Kentucky shine, |
|
| Author: | snowsport [ Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I had OME mediums up front with a bull bar (front half of a Rockfather 2 lift) for a couple of years, but upgraded because the front was starting to lower slightly. Now I have the HDs with just the bull bar (no winch yet) and I really like the ride a LOT. Much better than the mediums, IMO. |
|
| Author: | renegadekj [ Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm running the mediums up front without a winch or aftermarket bumper and i really like the ride.They probaly are a bit stiffer then the light springs but they also won't sag like the light springs probably would. I agree with tom and go with the HD's with the ARB bumper, you never know when you will get a sweet deal on a winch plus the ride quality won't be bad by no means. Josh |
|
| Author: | Jeepjeepster [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Many people run the HD springs with the stock bumper, so it shouldnt be a problem with the HD springs with the bumper. I had the MED springs with the stock bumper and only got 1.5in of lift. 2.5 with the Rustys front springs. |
|
| Author: | ARBSeth [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Woody, Like Jason says (although he gets stuck a lot, so you gotta question the source And I think I'm keeping the Beast, FYI... I'm meeting with the guys from Burnsville Off Road from MN while I'm at SEMA next week to talk about a V8 swap. I don't think a 5.7 will fit, but a 4.7 will.... Zoom Zoom, mofos! |
|
| Author: | elephantrider [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i like a stiff ride, but i dont like fat chics.. |
|
| Author: | WoodysKJ [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Don't let those tree hugers up there hear about that V8 swap out. I agree with the fat chic part. I don't mind the stiffer ride, but i wont need the HD springs cuz my wife is 5' nothing and all of MAYBE 120 lbs soaking... Well we will just leave it at that. This is a family forum. anyway, I will not turn down a deal on a winch so I am torn, HD or MD? If I go with MD's and get a wichch with Synthetic lines and a plate fairlead, say one of the 8,000 warn, how bad will that make the front sag. Can that winch with synthetis lines weigh that much? All Hail Skinny Chics and V8's |
|
| Author: | ARBSeth [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I've met Jason's wife... she's a cutie so he's ok... Texas girls are hot. Jury's still out on your Mrs. though, man... To Quote the great Ricky Bobby "Thank the good lord for my two boys Walker and Texas Ranger... and my smokin hot wife" Good times... Get the 927's... you'll be ok and you won't have to worry if a nice deal comes up on a winch later. |
|
| Author: | 0311_DoC [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ARBSeth wrote: Woody,
Like Jason says (although he gets stuck a lot, so you gotta question the source And I think I'm keeping the Beast, FYI... I'm meeting with the guys from Burnsville Off Road from MN while I'm at SEMA next week to talk about a V8 swap. I don't think a 5.7 will fit, but a 4.7 will.... Zoom Zoom, mofos! Dont suppose you could have some tickets for SEMA on will call could ya......... had to ask, I wanna go so bad..... |
|
| Author: | KY Liberty [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Swap a built 4.7 V8 in it. Or see if you can get hold of one of the new one's. 290 hp and 320 lb-ft torque would help a lot. |
|
| Author: | WoodysKJ [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nice V8 Hyjack guys!!!!!!! |
|
| Author: | KY Liberty [ Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
WoodysKJ wrote: Don't let those tree hugers up there hear about that V8 swap out.
All Hail Skinny Chics and V8's Felt we needed to help you get'r done. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|