AZScout wrote:
Tinman...with your experience with diesels and transmissions, what would you do to improve the CRD between the 2.8 engine and 545rfe transmission?
I am not a trans expert, I just spend a pathologic amount of time reading diesel forums. I don't have a fix but here are a few ideas. The worst thing I preceive in the CRD 545 is the mushy, sloppy shifts. Any auto trans that shifts smooth is doing so by slipping clutches between shifts to get a smooth transfer of power. That slipping will kill a tranny over time. It is not as bad on a gasser because the gassers don't have as much torque to do as much damage. That slippage with the torque of a diesel is more of a problem. ALL factory autos, IMO, are programed to fail because they are made as cheap as possible to get off the lot and make it until the warrenty expires. A good auto will have firm shifts so that clutch slipping is minimized. Most Jack and Jill comsumers don't like the firm shifting shifting, so the factory puts out trannys that are programemd to fail. I'm not talking about trannys that chirp the tires between shifts, but you should definitely feel it shift. Beefer internals and higher line pressure will help this.
The worst thing on most factor diesel autos is the loose TC. The CRDs 545 isn't too bad really. Not prefect but OK (way better then the D/C 47/48re or the Ford Torqueshift). The TC problem with the CRD apparently is the clutches and inability to hold. This could be fixed by changes such as more line pressure, better pump or more surface area - maybe multiple disc.
I think all the well known trans vendors have been mentioned in this thread. Any or which could give a disertation on the subject and would be glad to fix the problem if there was enough of a market to recoup thier R&D. D/C will never do any more than the necessary minimum.