F37 by build date?

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

Besides the TC, other reasonable explanations exist for the F37 cutoff date too.

1. Phased rollout of the recall.
2. The cutoff date represents the change in programming.
3. The cutoff date represents the date when they are sure the defective filters were no longer used.
4. Some combination of the above.

or, all or none of the above. Carefull, you may be asked to back these theories up. I have found no evidence of a
"phased recall". There most certainly was a programming change. The date is a cut off when the filter/split pick up tube was ceased. My tech who has done many F37's does indeed tell me the replacement TC are different than the OEM. s different "better?" Time will tell.

Goglio704 · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:52 am

Deleted to save space.

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:56 am

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

Besides the TC, other reasonable explanations exist for the F37 cutoff date too.

1. Phased rollout of the recall.
2. The cutoff date represents the change in programming.
3. The cutoff date represents the date when they are sure the defective filters were no longer used.
4. Some combination of the above.

or, all or none of the above. Carefull, you may be asked to back this stuff up.

No backing up needed. A working knowledge of English should have no trouble discerning the meaning of "reasonable explanation." Without that phrase the whole character of the statement changes from speculation to apparent statement of fact. Other helpful phrases include "I think" "I thought" or "I believe." Putting it in the form of a question also works. :wink:

Gottch! I'll just do a disclaimer at the beginning of my posts saying something like...."I don't really know this stuff. It is just what I read somewhere. Believe it or not."

Goglio704 · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:57 am

Deleted to save space.

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:04 am

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

Besides the TC, other reasonable explanations exist for the F37 cutoff date too.

1. Phased rollout of the recall.
2. The cutoff date represents the change in programming.
3. The cutoff date represents the date when they are sure the defective filters were no longer used.
4. Some combination of the above.

or, all or none of the above. Carefull, you may be asked to back this stuff up.

No backing up needed. A working knowledge of English should have no trouble discerning the meaning of "reasonable explanation." Without that phrase the whole character of the statement changes from speculation to apparent statement of fact. Other helpful phrases include "I think" "I thought" or "I believe." Putting it in the form of a question also works. :wink:

Gottch! I'll just do a disclaimer at the beginning of my posts saying something like...."I don't really know this stuff. It is just what I read somewhere. Believe it or not."

There is plenty of room in your signature. It would save some typing. :wink:

Hey, there's a thought.

I guess I'm so used to passing along this info, that sometimes, I fail to take into account that some folks need to see it in black and white. Most hearsays are usually found out soon enough, so it isn't good practise to try to BS a fellow. For the most part, I have not seen any BS about this rig posted.

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:07 am

DZL_LOU wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Not a problem. Just basking. :wink:

There had been some concern that I was passing along misinformation. Just pleased in the results. Maybe we can do a poll on whether any egr work has been done since ULSD and how many miles on the ULSD.

Not mis-information, just unsubstantiated information. There is a big difference between being mis-informed and being un-able to substantiate your claim, but propagate that claim as fact.

Turns out is was fact though....right? Perhaps, it is desireable to inform yourself, before putting the stick in the soon to be muddied waters. For example, you didn't believe me, and them you dug around and found out that I was correct. Might have saved yourself a little Carpal Tunnel if you would have looked at F37 first. It has been available on here for some time now.

Goglio704 · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:56 am

Deleted to save space.

crdmike · **Joined:** Tue May 16, 2006 7:25 pm **Posts:** 138

Goglio704 wrote:

If your CRD has not been recalled under F37, please post your build date and model year. Trying to find out what the cutoff date is and how many have been overlooked. If you have an 06 that is covered under F37 please post that also (at least until we get a representative sampling of build dates.) Just to be clear, I'm only looking for whether Jeep said the vehicle needs the F37, not whether it has actually been done. Thanks in advance.

February-2006 No F37 recall

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:08 am

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

Besides the TC, other reasonable explanations exist for the F37 cutoff date too.

1. Phased rollout of the recall.
2. The cutoff date represents the change in programming.
3. The cutoff date represents the date when they are sure the defective filters were no longer used.
4. Some combination of the above.

or, all or none of the above. Carefull, you may be asked to back this stuff up.

No backing up needed. A working knowledge of English should have no trouble discerning the meaning of "reasonable explanation." Without that phrase the whole character of the statement changes from speculation to apparent statement of fact. Other helpful phrases include "I think" "I thought" or "I believe." Putting it in the form of a question also works. :wink:

Gottch! I'll just do a disclaimer at the beginning of my posts saying something like...."I don't really know this stuff. It is just what I read somewhere. Believe it or not."

There is plenty of room in your signature. It would save some typing. :wink:

Hey, there's a thought.

I guess I'm so used to passing along this info, that sometimes, I fail to take into account that some folks need to see it in black and white. Most hearsays are usually found out soon enough, so it isn't good practise to try to BS a fellow. For the most part, I have not seen any BS about this rig posted.

I didn't think you'd actually put it in your sig. That's funny. A good sense of humor is essential here.

That's me. Just a big, clumsy funny guy. I hope all on here recognise that. It is difficult at times to get the true point across using this venue.

Jeger · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:22 am

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

Besides the TC, other reasonable explanations exist for the F37 cutoff date too.

1. Phased rollout of the recall.
2. The cutoff date represents the change in programming.
3. The cutoff date represents the date when they are sure the defective filters were no longer used.
4. Some combination of the above.

or, all or none of the above. Carefull, you may be asked to back this stuff up.

No backing up needed. A working knowledge of English should have no trouble discerning the meaning of "reasonable explanation." Without that phrase the whole character of the statement changes from speculation to apparent statement of fact. Other helpful phrases include "I think" "I thought" or "I believe." Putting it in the form of a question also works. :wink:

Gottch! I'll just do a disclaimer at the beginning of my posts saying something like...."I don't really know this stuff. It is just what I read somewhere. Believe it or not."

There is plenty of room in your signature. It would save some typing. :wink:

Hey, there's a thought.

I guess I'm so used to passing along this info, that sometimes, I fail to take into account that some folks need to see it in black and white. Most hearsays are usually found out soon enough, so it isn't good practise to try to BS a fellow. For the most part, I have not seen any BS about this rig posted.

I didn't think you'd actually put it in your sig. That's funny. A good sense of humor is essential here.

That's me. Just a big, clumsy funny guy. I hope all on here recognise that. It is difficult at times to get the true point across using this venue.

I just wanted to be in on all this quoting :lol:

Built 5-11-06 no recall....if anyone cares....

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:26 am

Jeger wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

Besides the TC, other reasonable explanations exist for the F37 cutoff date too.

1. Phased rollout of the recall.
2. The cutoff date represents the change in programming.
3. The cutoff date represents the date when they are sure the defective filters were no longer used.
4. Some combination of the above.

or, all or none of the above. Carefull, you may be asked to back this stuff up.

No backing up needed. A working knowledge of English should have no trouble discerning the meaning of "reasonable explanation." Without that phrase the whole character of the statement changes from speculation to apparent statement of fact. Other helpful phrases include "I think" "I thought" or "I believe." Putting it in the form of a question also works. :wink:

Gottch! I'll just do a disclaimer at the beginning of my posts saying something like...."I don't really know this stuff. It is just what I read somewhere. Believe it or not."

There is plenty of room in your signature. It would save some typing. :wink:

Hey, there's a thought.

I guess I'm so used to passing along this info, that sometimes, I fail to take into account that some folks need to see it in black and white. Most hearsays are usually found out soon enough, so it isn't good practise to try to BS a fellow. For the most part, I have not seen any BS about this rig posted.

I didn't think you'd actually put it in your sig. That's funny. A good sense of humor is essential here.

That's me. Just a big, clumsy funny guy. I hope all on here recognise that. It is difficult at times to get the true point across using this venue.

I just wanted to be in on all this quoting :lol:

Built 5-11-06 no recall....if anyone cares....

Then use these " "

Glad you're doing well.

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:04 pm

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

What he said and to add, there are two heater hose coming out of it. Thanks Rob.

Kellog13 · **Joined:** Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:21 pm **Posts:** 74

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

What he said and to add, there are two heater hose coming out of it. Thanks Rob.

Thanks for the info. Seems odd there is an engine driven pump already dedicated to fluid dymanics just to add another one that is elec clutch controlled, this easly would have been achieved by cycling the heaters on and off and use less energy, unless....

BVCRD · **Posted:** Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:59 pm

Kellog13 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Goglio704 wrote:

BVCRD wrote:

Kellog13 wrote:

Not on the list, 06CRD.
BVCRD- where's that viscous heater located btw.

Not too sure of the exact location. I put forth the question to my answer man and will get back to you shortly.

Viscous heater is on the passenger side up high in plain sight. It is belt driven and has an electric clutch on the front of it like an AC compressor.

What he said and to add, there are two heater hose coming out of it. Thanks Rob.

Thanks for the info. Seems odd there is an engine driven pump already dedicated to fluid dymanics just to add another one that is elec clutch controlled, this easly would have been achieved by cycling the heaters on and off and use less energy, unless....

I have been told that it is friction controled/operated and only works at a low rpm. Not sure when it cuts out.

tworock · **Posted:** Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:03 pm

newbie here, hello to all! build date is 08/05 purchased 06/06. F37 recall completed 02/15/07 by Continental Chrysler Jeep of Countryside, Illinois. noticed some shudder three to four (don't remember speed of the shift).

F37 by build date?

Who is online