tcoilburner wrote:
Sorry, I am not an expert. I may be a newbie here, but I grew up around diesels on the farm. Every engine we had, had a vacuum fuel system! I do admit none where common rail engines. My point is that a system with a leak is a problem(vacuum or pressure). Pressurizing the libby may solve the air leak, but if you are going to spend the money why not fix the problem( the leak). A properly running system, is always, better than one with a leak (vacuum or pressure). Maybe Chrysler should have used differnet connections down by the tank. That can be fixed cheaper than adding a pump?

I'm not trying to be mean, it's just that this subject has been beat to death over the years here. Most who have had air in fuel issues, have achieved a complete cure with a lift pump, even though there is no leak big enough for fuel to squirt out of. Air can pass through a microscopic hole with ease, but diesel cannot. Another issue which occurs with this system but not with the units you have on your farm, is that the 3 micron filter strips air out of the fuel when under vacuum, especially winter blends which might be found at a fuel station in summer.. I would also wager that you don't have any other vacuum draw type systems in your farm fleet, which have a top draw filter, placed at the highest point in the fuel system.
Vacuum draw systems can work well in many applications, but pressurized systems work much better. Have you ever tried to find an air leak in a vacuum draw system? Not fun. You are very right in that a properly running system is always better than one with a leak, DCX really dropped the ball on this one though, with their bean counting, as evidenced by the wiring and programing for the LP, but lack thereof.