Jett wrote:
I’m of the opinion that any 4wd that can grenade from that scenario has either maintenance or inherent design flaws.
Or that it's been pushed too hard in situations it was never designed to endure.
Quote:
How would you ever do Moab with such a delicate system?
Define what you mean by 'do Moab' and 'delicate'. I've been there in stock Jeeps, modified Jeeps, and a lifted (but otherwise stock) Subaru Forester. Didn't have any breakage in any of the aforementioned vehicles, but I was also aware of their limitations and pushed their capabilities accordingly. Conversely, there were people there running rigs with D60s at each end and Atlas transfer cases in-between, and they were getting into much heavier stuff and pushing their vehicles way harder than I was; they were also seeing breakage.
The point I'm getting at is that there are things in the drivetrain with operating specs that, if exceeded or neglected, will cause the item in question to grenade. Drivetrain bind is a known way to accelerate and/or cause those failures. 4FT is a known way to circumvent them.
Quote:
And who hasn’t forgotten their gear and turned onto dry pavement. I’ve done it many times. Heck, I had a Tacoma who’s 4wd switch was the exact same shape and size as the hvac controls and right next to it. That truck got shifted into 4wd on the street a few times.
Absolutely. I once had to drive 175 miles from Casper, Wyoming to Cheyenne, Wyoming in falling snow with an NP231-equipped XJ. Didn't really have much choice: it was 4PT the whole way. However, that was a less-than-ideal scenario for that transfer case. 4FT would have been far preferable when I hit clearer patches of roadway, spots that had been worn down to the pavement, or turned off into, say, a truck stop - or just overall, really.