Drewd wrote:
I suspect that repeated trips to a dealership for repairs are NOT a lemon CRD but a LEMON DEALERSHIP with clueless technicians who cannot properly diagnose and fix a problem correctly the first time.
I wonder if CRD tech's were VW trained
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
For some though, multiple transmission reprograms for "enhanced torque converter durability" (TSBs), Torque Converter recall - oh sorry - customer satisfaction campaign, BCM reprogram, Lower Ball Joint recalls ... very annoying and inconvenient to take the CRD in for, what seems like, monthly or semi-monthly dealer visits. The TSB's and recalls can't completely blamed on the dealer. If the CRD was engineered better and tested A LOT better before bringing it to market, these issues would have surfaced long before consumers began experiencing them. Makes you wonder if they just drove it around Detroit for a few days and figured - well - it runs fine in Europe, no need to go crazy on testing for this.
I like the diesel, it's my first. I like that it is in a well-proportioned (size-wise) SUV, but will I buy another Chrysler car again? Never.
I had a 99 Sebring with "auto-stick". Every year, for the 4 years I owned it, the transmission's sensors burned out and it had to be towed in for new ones. Of course, the parts were never in the area, so it sat for a few days waiting at the dealer.
Yes, I've had problems with other cars I've owned - but none as major as the drivetrain problems as I've had in both Chrysler cars I own(ed). What they offer in style, they lack miserably in engineering.
_________________
'05 CRD, Midnight Blue. Every option. Nice ride, idles like a garbage truck
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)