tulsa wrote:
alljeep wrote:
I suspect a lot of lemon law vehicles are due to dealership service departments that have not been able to diagnose problems correctly. It's possible this one was a lemon law vehicle but has since been corrected by a different service department that actually has a clue. If it drives good and has no codes thrown and no MIL on, then it's probably fine.
I've had a ton of TSBs done to mine, but it's never let me down.
What I am talking about is a "friendly buy back", a situtation where Chrysler buys the car back before the Lemon Law is put into effect. My understanding is that a friendly buy-back can result in a new clean title, whereas the title of the "Lemon Law" vehicle is so marked(I have 93 voyager with one). My 05 CRD was purchased in Arkansas and came with a clean new car title in November of 06, was built in August of 04. It was either a Corporate car or a friendly buy back, I do not know which. I talked with a dealer in KC before purchasing my Jeep and was informed that the CRD he had was a friendly buy back and had a normal title not one which had been re-issued. Because my CRD had a new title marked "used" I had to pay the standard tax to register it, not the tax based on the purchase price. It would be good to see the title and ask about it before you sign on the line.
Lewis
Interesting point. So, it's possible it could have a recurring problem - say something every couple thousand miles (or less) and there would not really be much record of it.
I still think that finding any CRD with this low of mileage has enough remaining factory warranty to work out the bugs. BUT, the buyer should talk with local dealers and have some comfort with a service department that is willing to go the distance for repairs and has had success with other CRD repairs(probably not an easy task to find such).
My CRD only has 16k on it, so maybe I'm not into the higher failure rate yet, but I have had a lot of difficulty finding a dealer to support my Jeep.