LOST JEEPS :: View topic - Eighty Cents more for DIesel WTF!?

I've seen $5/gal diesel and an 80 cent differential between diesel and rug, I paid $4.699 compared to $3.899

I hate my government

I guess the only thing to be thankful about is we don't need racing fuel at $8.99 a gallon. The difference between RUG and Diesel is around 55 cents now but earlier this year we had as much as 90 cents difference. Funny how much the price varies region to region. Yesterday diesel was $4.55 in the St. Louis area.

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

UFO wrote:

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

Sir Sam wrote:

UFO wrote:

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol :lol:

tjkj2002 wrote:

Sir Sam wrote:

UFO wrote:

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol :lol:

I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok.

UFO wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

Sir Sam wrote:

UFO wrote:

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol :lol:

I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok.

Boy you guy's just counterdick yourselfs all the time,ethanol is good,if used in the correct apps,just like biodiesel,great for some but a joke for others.And yes biodiesel and ethanol would be the classified as the same,a temp fix for a ever evolving problem.

tjkj2002 wrote:

UFO wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

Sir Sam wrote:

UFO wrote:

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol :lol:

I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok.

Please keep a civil tone here.

And yes, I hate ethanol in its current shape and form. In our previous discussion I noted that one reason I do not approve ethanol is because of use in NA engine.

A 3 Liter, twinturbo, running 10.5 compression with about 9lbs of boost would be wicked on ethanol. That would be a good application for ethanol.

Sir Sam wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

UFO wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

Sir Sam wrote:

UFO wrote:

On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol :lol:

I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok.

Oh sorry,never did learn to spell,no joke,kinda spell by sounding the words out.

You could always use spell check. Thats what the little red line under words is for...

I guess IE might not, I've been using Firefox for so long now that I forget what other browsers are like. Too bad it would make reading post a lot easier.

I guess IE might not, I've been using Firefox for so long now that I forget what other browsers are like. Too bad; it would make reading posts a lot easier.

Author:	CRDburnouts [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:42 am ]
Post subject:	Eighty Cents more for DIesel WTF!?
I've seen $5/gal diesel and an 80 cent differential between diesel and rug, I paid $4.699 compared to $3.899 I hate my government

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:19 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Eighty Cents more for DIesel WTF!?
CRDburnouts wrote: I've seen $5/gal diesel and an 80 cent differential between diesel and rug, I paid $4.699 compared to $3.899 I hate my government

Author:	kjfishman [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:04 am ]
Post subject:
I guess the only thing to be thankful about is we don't need racing fuel at $8.99 a gallon. The difference between RUG and Diesel is around 55 cents now but earlier this year we had as much as 90 cents difference. Funny how much the price varies region to region. Yesterday diesel was $4.55 in the St. Louis area.

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:12 am ]
Post subject:
kjfishman wrote: I guess the only thing to be thankful about is we don't need racing fuel at $8.99 a gallon. The difference between RUG and Diesel is around 55 cents now but earlier this year we had as much as 90 cents difference. Funny how much the price varies region to region. Yesterday diesel was $4.55 in the St. Louis area. Not paying it yet.

Author:	jinstall [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:
I do and it ia $11.20 a gallon here!

LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/

Eighty Cents more for DIesel WTF!? http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=33461	Page 1 of 1

Author:	UFO [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:
On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100.

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:
UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup.

Author:	tjkj2002 [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:
Sir Sam wrote: UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup. And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol !

Author:	UFO [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:37 pm ]
Post subject:
tjkj2002 wrote: Sir Sam wrote: UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup. And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol ! I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok.

Author:	tjkj2002 [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:
UFO wrote: tjkj2002 wrote: Sir Sam wrote: UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup. And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol ! I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok. Boy you guy's just counterdick yourselfs all the time,ethanol is good,if used in the correct apps,just like biodiesel,great for some but a joke for others.And yes biodiesel and ethanol would be the classified as the same,a temp fix for a ever evolving problem.

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:08 pm ]
Post subject:
tjkj2002 wrote: UFO wrote: tjkj2002 wrote: Sir Sam wrote: UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup. And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol ! I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok. Boy you guy's just counterdick yourselfs all the time,ethanol is good,if used in the correct apps,just like biodiesel,great for some but a joke for others.And yes biodiesel and ethanol would be the classified as the same,a temp fix for a ever evolving problem. Please keep a civil tone here. And yes, I hate ethanol in its current shape and form. In our previous discussion I noted that one reason I do not approve ethanol is because of use in NA engine. A 3 Liter, twinturbo, running 10.5 compression with about 9lbs of boost would be wicked on ethanol. That would be a good application for ethanol.

Author:	tjkj2002 [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:15 pm ]
Post subject:
Sir Sam wrote: tjkj2002 wrote: UFO wrote: tjkj2002 wrote: Sir Sam wrote: UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup. And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol ! I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok. Boy you guy's just counterdick yourselfs all the time,ethanol is good,if used in the correct apps,just like biodiesel,great for some but a joke for others.And yes biodiesel and ethanol would be the classified as the same,a temp fix for a ever evolving problem. Please keep a civil tone here. And yes, I hate ethanol in its current shape and form. In our previous discussion I noted that one reason I do not approve ethanol is because of use in NA engine. A 3 Liter, twinturbo, running 10.5 compression with about 9lbs of boost would be wicked on ethanol. That would be a good application for ethanol. Oh sorry,never did learn to spell,no joke,kinda spell by sounding the words out.

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:00 pm ]
Post subject:
tjkj2002 wrote: Sir Sam wrote: tjkj2002 wrote: UFO wrote: tjkj2002 wrote: Sir Sam wrote: UFO wrote: On my race car, I can up the fuel pressure and mix in E85 to get the octane to 100. I've been thinking about building a Ethanol Z, would be good with higher compression turbo charged setup. And from the one person that is dead set on hating ethanol ! I'm another ethanol hater. But a few gallons here or there for a spin around the block is ok. Boy you guy's just counterdick yourselfs all the time,ethanol is good,if used in the correct apps,just like biodiesel,great for some but a joke for others.And yes biodiesel and ethanol would be the classified as the same,a temp fix for a ever evolving problem. Please keep a civil tone here. And yes, I hate ethanol in its current shape and form. In our previous discussion I noted that one reason I do not approve ethanol is because of use in NA engine. A 3 Liter, twinturbo, running 10.5 compression with about 9lbs of boost would be wicked on ethanol. That would be a good application for ethanol. Oh sorry,never did learn to spell,no joke,kinda spell by sounding the words out. Well, thats rather unfortunate in this case, phonetically spelling it made the meaning come out offensive. Oh well, no harm no foul.

Author:	jdorris [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:36 pm ]
Post subject:
You could always use spell check. Thats what the little red line under words is for...

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:
jdorris wrote: You could always use spell check. Thats what the little red line under words is for... I don't think all browsers have that.

Author:	jdorris [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:
I guess IE might not, I've been using Firefox for so long now that I forget what other browsers are like. Too bad; it would make reading posts a lot easier.

Author:	Sir Sam [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:29 pm ]
Post subject:
jdorris wrote: I guess IE might not, I've been using Firefox for so long now that I forget what other browsers are like. Too bad it would make reading post a lot easier. Yup, knowing when your mispeeling a word is nice.

Author:	jdorris [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:
Ha!

Author:	Uffe [ Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:07 am ]
Post subject:
jdorris wrote: I guess IE might not, I've been using Firefox for so long now that I forget what other browsers are like. Too bad; it would make reading posts a lot easier. What? Firefucks has a speelling cjek???