evolDiesel wrote:
Sorry man; truly. I just don't want people to be misinformed about the engine or the fuel economy. I just checked fuely and the median of the bell curve looks to be right between 22/23 MPG. The population contains 63 data points for the 2005 CRD. Seems statistically significant to me.
If you are proud of your rig, that's all that matters. I didn't mean to break your balls. I came to chime in on the pulley/alternator question as I had first I hand experience with it on my rig.
Good luck w/ your CRD! (Once again, no sarcasm meant)
Thanks for the clarification and for posting instead of just letting it slide. I really appreciate the candor.
I know MPG is an area of great variance and people have a lot of questions. For the record, I'm getting around 19mpg average in the city and on the mountain roads (which is the majority of my driving), but I was getting 35mpg on the super-flat (slightly downhill going east) highways of KS. FWIW, the trip computer (not manually calculated) usually reads about 32mpg on the highway between Denver and Colorado Springs.
19mpg seems GREAT for an "SUV," especially on mountain roads and in the city and
especially with the amount of "fun" this little 4 cylinder torquer puts out. The huge MPG increase during highway mileage is just the cream on top.
Regarding the issue this thread is
actually about, I went with a new alternator (and thus a new decoupler/pulley) with a lifetime warranty installed by a mechanic with a year warranty on labor for less than $300 all-in. The pulley by itself would have cost me nearly $80, and a new lifetime warranty alternator is $145 with a $60 core charge. We got nearly 10" of snow this weekend, so having somebody else swap the alternator for only $150 more than the part rather than me curse cold fingers and dropped tools/parts in the driving snow seemed like the right way to go.
Thanks again for your follow up comments.