MACKJ wrote:
Hi Uffe,
Glad to see you are still hanging around. The frequency was measured at 1867 Hz. (Frequency of engine at idle was 12.67 Hz =760rpm)
Here are the accelerometer readings also;
Location Vibration level – velocity (mm/s)
Longitudinal Lateral Vertical
Front of sump 2.9 32.7 4.7
Rear of sump 2.2 31.2 2.5
Engine head 0.9 24.3 3.5
Bell housing 1.7 25.6 2.8
Transmission 0.7 22.0 1.1
Transfer case 1.4 9.9 13.9
Very interesting data I must say. I would dearly have liked to have two or more points where data was captured. E.g. at 1300 and 2000 rpm as well as idle. I know it isn't easy manually adjusting the RPM, but if you can use a brick or something to hold the pedal it doesn't matter if it is 1958rpm or 2000 rpm, just keep the RPM constant while measuring.
I know a little bit about accelerometers because I used to work at Grundfos with accelerometers for detecting bearing failures in induction motors. Is it possible I can get a track of the vibration signal? Any data file will do fine.
Normally when measuring vibration and it comes from an internal part (say a bearing for instance) the resulting vibration signal is completely different. You cannot directly find where the source is, when you look at a vibration signals FFT. You need to do some pre-processing.
The reason is that the internal vibrated component is stuck in the major engine structure, and the component can only talk to us through the entire engine. That means when the little component says "beep" the engine transfers the beep through its structure, changes the frequency and amplitude, and outputs a vibration signal. The pre-processing technique is highly likely known by your colleagues as Envelope analysis, can you tell me if they did such analysis?
If not, tell them to use an envelope analyser on the signal, and report back what frequency they come up with then. It is very likely that the real frequency isn't more than 2x or 4x the crankspeed, but because of the engine structure and vibration resonance the frequency is changed to a much higher one.
At least this theory is true for bearing analysis in induction motors, small or big.
How was the transmission set up?