I have been looking and thinking about hydrogen generators.
Electrical pulses not electrolysis?
Stanley Meyer?
Any thoughts

I'm putting Red matter in my tank.

Unfortunately there has been so much negative response against people who believe that they can run their cars on water that hydrogen fuel cells have attained a bad rapport. I know that our trucks do not always burn the fuel at 100% because it is still illegal to remove the catalytic converter. I am open to the idea that the introduction of hydrogen may help burn the fuel more efficiently giving better economy. Even over the current loss it takes to generate the hydrogen. Maybe someone on the forum has tried it? Kits seem to be very cheap now to buy.

thermodynamic suicide

Unfortunately there has been so much negative response against people who believe that they can run their cars on water that hydrogen fuel cells have attained a bad rapport. I know that our trucks do not always burn the fuel at 100% because it is still illegal to remove the catalytic converter. I am open to the idea that the introduction of hydrogen may help burn the fuel more efficiently giving better economy. Even over the current loss it takes to generate the hydrogen. Maybe someone on the forum has tried it? Kits seem to be very cheap now to buy.

....Controllable fusion becomes reality. Until then, it will take the same energy to split up the water into hydrogen and oxygen as you will get when you burn it and put it back together. Now subtract the thermal efficiency factor of the engine or fuel cell and you get less than what you put in.
The laws of physics are not forgiving.
When Fusion does become reality, sea weed huggers (by then tree huggers will evolve to have at least room temperature IQs) will claim Helium emissions are harming the Karma of the sea weed.

Again, I am not arguing the laws of physics.
Consider gasoline fuel injection. Why do you get better efficiency if you have to put energy in to drive a pump? Because better atomization of the droplets and less waste becomes greater than energy lost to create the higher pressure. Maybe hydrogen or oxygen could burn the droplets more efficiently. I know that many say this works.

If you are concerned about the <1% of unburnt and underburnt fuel ...

This may be the crux of the matter for us. Maybe the carburated gassers can see an improvement in economy by using a hydrogen cell but it may do next to nothing for us.

Every single one of the HHO proponent's claims is knocked down scientifically here. http://www.aardvark.co.nz/hho_scam.shtml

The experimental results demonstrate that the hydrogen addition in the intake air has an
influence on improvement of engine power, and energy consumption (Fig. 5, 7, . NO
emissions are very complicated (Fig. 9). Higher smoke of exhaust gases is observed (Fig. 10).
The higher engine power with hydrogen addition (Fig. 5, 7) is due to the additional heat
released from hydrogen combustion and to the reduced combustion duration (1). The
combustion of hydrogen addition provides additional heat energy, which is one of the reasons
for а higher engine output. The shorter combustion duration causes lower heat transfer rate
thought the combustion chamber walls and higher diesel fuel heat utilization. As a result of
the calculations that were done, the increase of the whole heat added to the engine cycle due
to hydrogen combustion is 2,44% averaged over the entire investigated engine speed region.
But the averaged power improvement obtained as a result of the experimental investigation is
15% (Fig. 7). The middle indicated pressure improvement at 1500 rpm is 14.8% (Fig. 5).
These facts show that the power improvement comes not only from the energy added as a
result of hydrogen addition. The greater part of power increase is due to combustion process
improvement by the means of combustion duration reduction because of superior combustion
and flame propagation properties of hydrogen. The proofs of this statement are the curves of
net heat release and net heat release rate shown respectively on (Fig. 4) and (Fig. 3).

Show me a link that proves that unburnt hydrocarbons are not reduced by hydrogen fuel cells please.