tjkj2002 wrote:
Quote:
...is an ionized water, such was salt water, non-corrosive then?
Hope you were kidding

I was. I was searching for the logic of how distilled water could be perfectly fine while deionized water is super corrosive.
Nursecosmo is all over this. For all intents and purposes, both are the same and if the processing was done precisely, no one would be able to tell the difference. There are enough additives in the anitfreeze to swamp the effects of anything residual in the DI water. The last thing I'd ever do would be to use the crap out of my tap (wells in mid-MI are very briny).
An argument could be made that any water (without preventative additives) is "corrosive." Water, having wondrous powers, will seek an equilibrium with its surroundings. Take copper pipes for example. When water flows through, it establishes an equilibrium in the copper where it actually dissolves a bit of it by converting it to Cu2+. Flowing in fresh water continually refreshes that equilibrium. Because of that, copper house pipes have finite lifetimes (~30 years, hot line usually croaks first) because they more or less got dissolved over all that time by the gazillions of gallons of water that flowed through them. If the water wasn't flowing, they'd probably outlast any of us.
The same process would take place to some degree with the iron and aluminum alloys of the engine if it wasn't for the antifreeze additives. Since it's a relatively closed system, once the equilibriums are established, there isn't a removal process taking place to continually drive it to one side or the other...neither dissolving additional engine material or redepositing it.
Sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and high salt concentations (compare our vehicles in MI relative to those in AZ) are corrosive. In this context, the corrosivity of ultrapure water relative to DI or distilled water is essentially neglible.
Like nursecosmo said...buy whichever is cheapest.