A parent's reply would be "because" which translates to no particularly good reason.
Mechanical timing between crank and valves, as opposed to ignition or firing timing, is obviously controlled by mechanical means. Back in the day most all engines used timing chains riding on steel toothed gears, which were superseded by timing chains riding on plastic toothed steel gears, which were superseded by timing belts ostensibly because those shifts produced progressively quieter engines. Having driven and worked on all 3 types I don't believe for one second the "quieter" argument rather I believe cheaper to make and maybe planned obsolescence. Chain on steel gears could last somewhat over 100,000 miles when lubed properly and probably longer if a tensioner was in the system. Chain on plastic toothed steel gears might make 100,000 miles before the teeth were gone. Early timing belts were lucky to make 75,000 miles and almost never made 80,000 miles. I've omitted direct gear to gear driven timing as I understand that's relatively uncommon.
If I was guessing timing belt driven systems are more common where the design of the engine is such that the belt does thing other than just keep crank and valves in time. For example the CRD TB drives the CP3 and the water pump in addition to the 2 cams.
_________________ Sold to LOST member my 05 Ltd, GDE Stg II turbo + TCM tune, SunCoast TC w. Transgo kit, Steiger window regulators, Samcos, Fumoto valve, 2nd gen filter head with Lub. Spec. bleeder, Hayden clutch & 11 blade fan, inverted spare, P-1 battery, BF Goodrich Long Trail TAs, Etecno1 glow plugs, timing belt at 50K miles/8 yrs
|