DieselDave63 wrote:
By playing the veteran's card in my posts about geordi's underhanded dealings with High Iron CRD in the way I did generated knee-jerk/snap responses from geordi in which he further incriminated himself.
My apologies for poorly representing other veterans. Once I learned of geordi's disdain for us I figured I'd use it to draw him out. It worked. Of course there won't be vets lining up at his parents house, where he lives, to make him pay up, lol. The only actions will be small claims court if necessary.
Having those threads frozen is a good thing. I believe the info contained is also frozen and no edits can be made to spin the 'facts' in anyone's favor. Now interested parties can digest the info as it came out. The criticized writing style of highironcrd is simply him being real. Believe me it is no indication of the man's intelligence. In person on the phone you will meet an educated gentleman as articulate and clear headed as a man can be. The insults from geordi towards highiron are meant to mislead you and to discredit the man he owes money to. That became obvious to me once I spoke with Mr. High Iron CRD.
I see disingenuous deflections and spin from the guy who spent the other guys deposit and simply doesn't have it to pay back. Red Flag.
UNFORTUNATELY, geordi is an absolute master at spinning the rhetoric and the narrative of any given subject on the problems of the Liberty CRD. What he should be doing is working for the Democratic Party!!
He has fooled a lot of members here on this forum with his following threads:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=84902viewtopic.php?f=5&t=79984Nothing will ever come to conclusion regarding these threads because he refuses to accept all the parameters that may cause problems in these areas. Why then did he post these threads, if not to come to some conclusion? The following is my supposition, based on anecdotal evidence and things geordi himself has posted on here and on FaceBook...
1) It makes him out to look like an authority in these areas, when in fact he has not stated that he has any formal training in as a diesel technician, or even an automotive technician. He is most certainly not an engineer of any kind; that I know of for sure.
2) These threads were created to promote the idea that the TTY bolts and the valves of the R428 engine are the crux of the problem with head gasket and valve failures. This is quite convenient for him because that just so happens to be the area of servicing that he performs.
Both of these things - as well as his frequent interjections into threads - serve to promote his business. This is now appropriate for him to do so as he is now an official vendor, but he was not for the longest time. Some member finally complained about this, and now he has to pay to be an official vendor.
It is VERY interesting that geordi - until now - has not received nearly the level of scrutiny from people like Ceearedeedriver and jws84_02 that they have leveled at me. You two continue to employ a double-standard when it comes to geordi and me.
Both of you were all over me when I promoted the H.D.S. Model 001
as an Official Vendor when people inquired about CRD engine thermostat problems, even though it was my right to do so, and yet looked the other way when geordi promoted his services on threads he did not start
when he was not even an Official Vendor.
Ceearedeedriver, you are the absolute worst when it comes to hypocrisy. You try to take the moral high ground here, yet you gleefully promote and have used Sarge Industries' knock-off thermostat modification where he STOLE my idea of using the Hemi thermostat valve. That is bad enough... it is completely legal to do so, but moral? I think not. Then you had the temerity to claim it is as good as the Hot Diesel Solutions Model 001, even though at the time you made those claims you had neither Sarge's unit OR mine in your hands to compare against each other.
The threads you CLAIM were general discussions that I "hijacked" were involving CRD cooling systems; that was fair game for me when I was an Official Vendor. But I guess it is O.K. for you and other members to hijack my customer's thread when he posted about 3 months back a favourable thread on my product. Hypocrite!
For those of you reading this that may think I am against ARP studs, I will state for the record that I am not against them. I simply think the following should be taken into consideration...
Are ARP head studs superior to the O.E. TTY studs? Most certainly they are, but the TTY studs have been used R428 engines in markets all over the world, and they do not have the problems that we seem to be having in North America. A CRD owner should only be replacing O.E. stud sets with ARP head studs if the head gasket has failed.