highironcrd wrote:
who's treatment??are you referring to the way Geordi has been Treated?
Yes, I was comparing the way the threads you started were locked (Geordi's treatment) versus the way threads attacking other vendors have been handled by the forum moderators. I'm not commenting on your personal grievance with Geordi and I don't believe you should be either given your pending court action. I would certainly bear your review in mind in the extremely unlikely event I ever considered hiring Geordi.
I didn't fully read your story because it was too littered with irrelevant details but I believe the summary is:
- You paid Geordi a deposit for a vehicle you were planning to buy from him
- Geordi is unable to deliver said vehicle in the condition you agreed to buy it
- It's not clear if you both agree on the amount owing
- Geordi has agreed to return your money but indicated he cannot at the moment because he doesn't have sufficient funds
If you take this to court the judge will undoubtedly rule in your favour but given Geordi's stated financial situation I'm not sure what outcome you're looking for here. If Geordi doesn't have the assets to cover this the Judge will likely look at his income and order some sort of repayment schedule that he can realistically manage. You may or may not get awarded costs.
Given you both appear to agree that Geordi owes you money I'm not quite sure why you can't figure out a repayment schedule between yourselves rather that involving the courts?