It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:56 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: How UK looks at new diesels
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 12:37 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:21 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Reading PA
Diesels’ Removal Linked to Cleaner Air, Fuel Savings
WardsAuto -Alan Harman

Replacing all the diesel-powered cars in the U.K. more than 10 years old with the latest models could save 207 million gallons (173 million U.K. gallons) of diesel fuel a year.

The figure was reached by researchers for service and repair company Kwik Fit, who crunched the numbers using U.K. government vehicle statistics and based their results on a national scrappage scheme that would see the older diesel vehicles permanently removed from the road.

They found U.K. motorists are driving 30.2 billion miles (48.6 billion km) a year in about 3.5 million diesel cars – an average of 8,676 miles (13,970 km) each – that were first registered in 2007 or before.

With average fuel economy rising over the past decade, if these journeys were made in new diesel cars, drivers’ total savings on fuel costs would be about £947.8 million ($1.27 billion) a year.

There also would be a reduction in heavy-truck traffic, as the fuel saving is equivalent to more than 20,700 full loads of the largest fuel tankers, which carry 10,000 (U.S.) gallons each.

Additionally, there would be a significant drop in emissions as the older cars that at best meet Euro 4 emissions standards would be replaced by those meeting Euro 6 requirements.

Nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions would fall 68% to 8.5 million lbs. (3.9 million kg), while particulate matter would fall 80% to 529,110 lbs. (240,000 kg).

The Kwik Fit researchers believe the improvement in real-world performance over the past decade means these figures are a conservative estimate of the potential reductions in emissions. That’s because the analysis is based on all the older diesels being replaced by cars with new diesel engines, whereas many in fact would be swapped for electric or hybrid-electric vehicles.

An earlier study by Kwik Fit found only a third of diesel owners would buy another diesel vehicle when they replace their current model. With many drivers indicating they might switch to gasoline, the researchers assessed the impact of swapping diesels over 10 years old for new gasoline models.

In this scenario, there would be an even greater reduction in emissions over the same mileage, with the level of NOx falling 20.3 million lbs. (9.2 million kg), while the drop in particulates would be the same as with a switch to new diesels.

However, there would be a tradeoff as there could be a 53.6 million-lb. (24.3 million-kg) increase in the level of carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, due to the CO limits on gasoline engines being higher than for diesel.

Kwik Fit Communications Director Roger Griggs says the cost of replacing all diesels more than 10 years old with new models, assuming an average new-car price of £28,000 ($37,480), would be more than £97.3 billion ($130.2 billion).

“Currently, this cost would be borne solely by the individual motorist,” he says in a statement. “Any incentives the government can give the private individual to move to more efficient vehicles could have a significant impact.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How UK looks at new diesels
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:43 am
Posts: 4962
Location: Green Cove Springs FL
sounds like a cash for clunkers program

_________________
U.S. Army Retired


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How UK looks at new diesels
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 3:52 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:29 pm
Posts: 1167
I am skeptical about all of this "research". Government data has universally been inaccurate and guilty leaving out a great deal, (if not all), of the contrary and potential downside consequences. After all, a government wants to sell a gullible public on its plans, and they do not want to give any ammunition to its opponents for counter-arguments.

The Jeep Liberty CRD reliability problems are a direct result of such planning from governments.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How UK looks at new diesels
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 9:05 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:36 pm
Posts: 7173
Location: Central GA
TURBO-DIESEL-FREAK wrote:
I am skeptical about all of this "research". Government data has universally been inaccurate and guilty leaving out a great deal, (if not all), of the contrary and potential downside consequences. After all, a government wants to sell a gullible public on its plans, and they do not want to give any ammunition to its opponents for counter-arguments.
The Jeep Liberty CRD reliability problems are a direct result of such planning from governments.

X2!

_________________
Supporting Vendor and Moderator of LOST
05 Jeep Liberty CRD Limited :JEEPIN:
Ironman Springs/Bilstein/Shocks
Yeti StgIV Hot Tune
Week's BatteryTray
No FCV/EGR
Samcos/ProVent
SunCoast/Transgo
Carter Intank-pmp
2mic.Sec.Fuel Filter
Flowmaster/NO CAT
V6Airbox/noVH
GM11 Bld.fan/HDClutch
IronrockArms/wwdieselMount

98 Dodge Cummins 24 Valve


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How UK looks at new diesels
PostPosted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:18 am 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:12 pm
Posts: 2505
Location: Oregon Coast Dairy Country. Land of stumps, dumps, and "Liquid Pumps"
So.. when one sorts through all the extraneous propaganda BS, it boils down to this:

The individual motorists (but only the ones driving diesels) are expected to bear the cost of $130,200,000,000, for a maximum possible annual savings of $1,270,000,000.

Thus, in terms of time, the break-even point would be 102.52 years.

I don't believe any of such daily driven vehicles referred to in this study, new or old, would be operational at that point, and that's without even considering the future value of the original cost. (+102.52 years of inflation and interest)

In other words, their entire argument is meaningless.

_________________
'06 Lbrty Sprt CRD 150K

Sasquatch
DSS Turbo
CAT-elimntr
Weeks Stg1&2 EGRfix
PV-200
BLING
vent gauges

IDParts
head
cams
rockers
Timing set
ARP studs
eTn1 GX2123 5v GPs

YETI Custom Tune
Flowmaster 8325508
Carter P76611M
GM 12611872
Hayden 2986
GM 15976889
PATC Custom Billet
2010 Ram Hemi Trans
Sonnax 44957
Transgo kit
Cooper 51770


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com