Fuel economy down, soot up, power fine

carbcoma · **Joined:** Sat Oct 01, 2016 9:48 pm **Posts:** 86

I was thinking that too, maybe the bypass provides greater vacuum to the turbo. I will keep that in mind.

WWDiesel · **Posted:** Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:59 pm

carbcoma wrote:

I was thinking that too, maybe the bypass provides greater vacuum to the turbo. I will keep that in mind.

It would only provide greater vacuum to the turbo if the modulator valve was calling for more boost and due to whatever reason was not getting full vacuum on the supply side because of a faulty solenoid valve or vacuum reservoir leaking, or a leaking hose. :juggle:

casm · **Joined:** Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:05 pm **Posts:** 694

Grotsoldaat wrote:

Naturally, as it is based in science and carved-on-a stone-level experience blowing things up as a combat engineer in the army. Next offered fix would have been called anti-tank-mine-treatment.

See, I'm not opposed to the anti-tank-mine treatment. It's highly-effective, and it's difficult to deal with results.

The only real question is how quickly do you want the treatment to work? Small arms fire can make it last for years, which has its own entertainment value

Grotsoldaat · **Posted:** Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:37 am

casm wrote:

Grotsoldaat wrote:

Naturally, as it is based in science and carved-on-a stone-level experience blowing things up as a combat engineer in the army. Next offered fix would have been called anti-tank-mine-treatment.

See, I'm not opposed to the anti-tank-mine treatment. It's highly-effective, and it's difficult to deal with results.

The only real question is how quickly do you want the treatment to work? Small arms fire can make it last for years, which has its own entertainment value

I prefer fast results in treatment. Better one big scratch than eternal pricking... :seuss:

Fuel economy down, soot up, power fine

Who is online