LOST JEEPS
http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/

WK Comments
http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=35456		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  MOSFET [ Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:  WK Comments
Any comments on what to look out for on the WK? How are the 2006 and 2007 model years?
Author:  Burchie [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WK Comments
MOSFET wrote:
Any comments on what to look out for on the WK? How are the 2006 and 2007 model years?


'06 and '07 were good years. Stay far away from the '05. That was the 1st year of the WK. It's a great cruising jeep, but I'm not to sure about off roading in them. They are big and heavy.
Author:  Inc [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WK Comments
Burchie wrote:
They are big and heavy.

So is the KJ and KK. :?
Author:  Jeepjeepster [ Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
Kj is big and heavy? The WK weighs 600lbs more and it a lot bigger than a kj. Turning radius isnt near as good either.

No problems with our 06 Hemi..
Author:  Marlon_JBT [ Fri Nov 28, 2008 7:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Jeepjeepster wrote:
Kj is big and heavy? The WK weighs 600lbs more and it a lot bigger than a kj. Turning radius isnt near as good either.

No problems with our 06 Hemi..
The KJ *is* big and heavy. For how big it is, it could be much lighter. WK weight is dependent on engine and it too is big and heavy and could use some weight loss.

The KJ was mostly developed under Chrysler. Chrysler didn't care much about the weight of the vehicle and Mercedes (under which the WK was developed... mostly) REALLY didn't care. Their cars and trucks are extremely overweight for how big they are.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/