Transfer cases

tjkj2002 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:05 pm

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

JJsTJ · **Posted:** Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:16 pm

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

tjkj2002 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:20 pm

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

Hey I'm getting as inpatient as you are,but like stated before some issues/papers need signing before we can start.

JJsTJ · **Posted:** Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:56 pm

tjkj2002 wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

Hey I'm getting as inpatient as you are,but like stated before some issues/papers need signing before we can start.

Gotchya!!

Papers need signing?? Buying a house or something?

tjkj2002 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:58 pm

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

Hey I'm getting as inpatient as you are,but like stated before some issues/papers need signing before we can start.

Gotchya!!

Papers need signing?? Buying a house or something?

Nope and not me.

Rock Lizard · **Posted:** Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:48 am

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

Hey I'm getting as inpatient as you are,but like stated before some issues/papers need signing before we can start.

Gotchya!!

Papers need signing?? Buying a house or something?

More like I am getting rid of some dramatic baggage. :twisted:

tjkj2002 · **Posted:** Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:52 am

Rock Lizard wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

Hey I'm getting as inpatient as you are,but like stated before some issues/papers need signing before we can start.

Gotchya!!

Papers need signing?? Buying a house or something?

More like I am getting rid of some dramatic baggage. :twisted:

I think that's a bit of a understatement :lol:

Inc · **Posted:** Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:36 am

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

Good to hear. Sounds worth it to me.

tommudd · **Posted:** Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:47 am

tjkj2002 wrote:

Rock Lizard wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

JJsKJ wrote:

tjkj2002 wrote:

ohv_kj wrote:

ARBSeth wrote:

It worked fine and I beat the Shizzle out of it.
The only thing you need to do is put a TJ shift fork into it instead of the KJ one... some intereference issues there... but other than that, no worries.

And man, 4:1 with 4:56's and 35's was about perfect for crawling with that 3.7... and the 2 Low was a nice option, too. If you want low gears, it works just great for the cash and amount of work.

agreed

4:3:1 with 5.13's and 35's will be better,and front only low or high,rear only low will be extra nice :wink:

.

sure looks good on paper anyway..... poke..poke
:twisted:

Hey I'm getting as inpatient as you are,but like stated before some issues/papers need signing before we can start.

Gotchya!!

Papers need signing?? Buying a house or something?

More like I am getting rid of some dramatic baggage. :twisted:

I think that's a bit of a understatement :lol:

RL,

Every once in a while, although at the time it seems like a hard thing to do, but "cleaning out the house and getting rid of dramatic baggage " is the best in the long run.
Of course I think you already know that! Hang in there, we're all behind you !

Tom

back on topic :wink: