| LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/ |
|
| whose kj? http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=42335 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | jerbacher [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | whose kj? |
Someone on EXPO posted some pics from EJS this year and there were some of this SFA KJ. Anyone seen this one before?
|
|
| Author: | JJsTJ [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
any LEOs that can accidently find the owner via the plate number? don't want to bash it so I'll bite my tongue but that Really makes me feel much better about the height of mine. Would really like to see better pics of the setup especially the rear coil-overs and hear from the owner/builder all about it and how it rides, handles, etc. |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
wonder what it says on the doors? Looks way to high to me , but would like to know more! |
|
| Author: | jerbacher [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommudd wrote: wonder what it says on the doors? Looks way to high to me , but would like to know more!
Ok, heres the site that those pics came from http://rokklym.smugmug.com/gallery/7925594_DfQiU#P-1-15 you can zoom a whole lot more then the small versions that i posted here. I zoomed in and it says: "This is a prototype suspension kit. If you have questions, or would like to be put on the list call: 208-390-5696 after April 15th. Thanks, NXS@ida.net" I'm not sure about the email address, its kind of hard to read, but I'm pretty sure thats what it says. |
|
| Author: | Fulltimer [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
It would seem that it wouldn't be very stable. Too high. Terry |
|
| Author: | Blue KJ in PA [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Disclaimer: I just drive my Jeep and do minor work...I'm a chemist not a mechanic. To me that looks like a jacked up pavement queen with no more ground clearance than mine with stock suspension. Yes, it has SFA but isn't the point of lifting to get more clearance? |
|
| Author: | Fulltimer [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
No gas tank protection, no sliders and the exhaust tail pipe would get ripped off, especially when that step caves in. But, after all it is just testing the setup I guess. Terry |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jerbacher wrote: tommudd wrote: wonder what it says on the doors? Looks way to high to me , but would like to know more! Ok, heres the site that those pics came from http://rokklym.smugmug.com/gallery/7925594_DfQiU#P-1-15 you can zoom a whole lot more then the small versions that i posted here. I zoomed in and it says: "This is a prototype suspension kit. If you have questions, or would like to be put on the list call: 208-390-5696 after April 15th. Thanks, NXS@ida.net" I'm not sure about the email address, its kind of hard to read, but I'm pretty sure thats what it says. yep went over to Expo to look at the pics and was coming back to post, but Jon, but you beat me to it! |
|
| Author: | jerbacher [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Blue KJ in PA wrote: Disclaimer: I just drive my Jeep and do minor work...I'm a chemist not a mechanic.
To me that looks like a jacked up pavement queen with no more ground clearance than mine with stock suspension. Yes, it has SFA but isn't the point of lifting to get more clearance? yes, the axles are still a bit low, but the only way around that is really big tires. being that high would give great approach, departure, and breakover angles. as long as the tires are being planted on obstacles, then it would do great. the tires look a little small, but that just means it would have better up travel, i guess. that thing has to be really super duper top heavy though! thats where mopar's 'lower forty' that they just made comes in as well as AEV's highline tj kit. through body work, it allows bigger tires and travel without raising the suspension up as much, keeping the COG lower. |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fulltimer wrote: No gas tank protection, no sliders and the exhaust tail pipe would get ripped off, especially when that step caves in. But, after all it is just testing the setup I guess.
Terry C'mon, with that approach, departure, and breakover angle, if you hit the rockers or gas tank in that thing, you're probably doing something you shouldn't do |
|
| Author: | Neatus [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Maybe its a little to high but I think it is cool. |
|
| Author: | ramlebliberty [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
the control arms on that thing look mighty short... and he needs spacers baaaaaaaad. I could push that KJ over its so top heavy. Sure is pretty, bet he could fit 40's. |
|
| Author: | meh_kick [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jerbacher wrote: tommudd wrote: wonder what it says on the doors? Looks way to high to me , but would like to know more! Ok, heres the site that those pics came from http://rokklym.smugmug.com/gallery/7925594_DfQiU#P-1-15 you can zoom a whole lot more then the small versions that i posted here. I zoomed in and it says: "This is a prototype suspension kit. If you have questions, or would like to be put on the list call: 208-390-5696 after April 15th. Thanks, NXS@ida.net" I'm not sure about the email address, its kind of hard to read, but I'm pretty sure thats what it says. Nevermind the Libby. I dig this tandem axle Dodge!
|
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
meh_kick wrote: jerbacher wrote: tommudd wrote: wonder what it says on the doors? Looks way to high to me , but would like to know more! Ok, heres the site that those pics came from http://rokklym.smugmug.com/gallery/7925594_DfQiU#P-1-15 you can zoom a whole lot more then the small versions that i posted here. I zoomed in and it says: "This is a prototype suspension kit. If you have questions, or would like to be put on the list call: 208-390-5696 after April 15th. Thanks, NXS@ida.net" I'm not sure about the email address, its kind of hard to read, but I'm pretty sure thats what it says. Nevermind the Libby. I dig this tandem axle Dodge! ![]() The old Dodge was built 6 or 8 years ago at least I have pictures of it in some old 4Whhel Drive magazines , guy built it to haul his familt y and go anywhere he wanted. Its been around for a while |
|
| Author: | ATXKJ [ Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The SFA KJ was also featured in this thread - http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=42134 |
|
| Author: | USAFCOP [ Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: whose kj? |
jerbacher wrote: Someone on EXPO posted some pics from EJS this year and there were some of this SFA KJ. Anyone seen this one before?
![]() no front drive shaft....It is just as good as mine in its present state... |
|
| Author: | JeepinJarhead03 [ Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
that dodge looks like somethin I'd drive to work every day I don't like it when people take my favorite parking spot |
|
| Author: | KJ kyle [ Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
isnt that the dodge that won top truck challenge a few years back? and the liberty is ugly but it appears he does good work, maybe someone can call him and come up with a better design |
|
| Author: | STINGN [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
you guys are all missing the point, all about offroading, think of the little things like "HOW THE **** AM I GOING TO PUT GAS IN THIS THING!" |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
STINGN wrote: you guys are all missing the point, all about offroading, think of the little things like "HOW THE **** AM I GOING TO PUT GAS IN THIS THING!"
same way I did on my 4WD Dodge van on 40s....... just reach up some! |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|