It is currently Mon Oct 13, 2025 7:33 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Just thinking out loud
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:15 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:44 am
Posts: 744
Location: Lorton, VA
Curious:

Why did they go with the 3.7 V6 instead of the 4.0 Inline Six?

_________________
2008 Jeep Commander Overland
1999 Chevrolet Corvette

http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/
http://www.jeepcommander.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:24 pm
Posts: 143
Location: Arizona
The reasons the 4.0L went away [except in the Wrangler, so far] was due mainly to age of the manufacturing tooling, which was worn out. The long stroke made it harder to clean up the emissions of NOx, and NIH ("Not Invented Here"), in my opinion, also reared its head. To completely retool would have cost as much (almost) as the 3.7L v6 did, and the Dodges were going to use the 3.7 as a base engine. Logically, the engine group did what they were told to satisfy the dealers...."Make a modern engine, and junk the old ones." This statement is my opinion, based on conversations at the time.

I found this on Allpar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:28 am
Posts: 10686
Location: Some where in Colorado
Heck, I don't understand why the KK didn't get the 4.0 V6 like the KA's did

_________________
2008 KK Liberty Sport NIGHT OPS EDITION + GILLS
OEM & Custom Skids - Factory Tow Package - Rock Lizard Skink Super Sliders
Prototype JBA 4 Inch Lift - JBA UCA's - Flowmaster Super 44 OR - Whacked Resonator
Jet Stage 2 - RL Gecko Basket Rack - Custom Winch Bumper - Recon 10.5K Winch
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:32 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:04 am
Posts: 1257
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
I think the biggest failure with the KK is the 3.7 ... It sucks.

Jeep Liberty - 3.7L - 210HP / 235TQ ... Fuel 16/22

Acura MDX - 3.7L - 300HP / 275TQ ... Fuel 15/20
Hyunai Veracruz - 3.8L - 260HP / 257TQ ... Fuel 16/23
Toyota RAV4 - 3.5L - 269HP /246TQ ... Fuel 19/27

Jeep 3.7 gets a big ol' F-

_________________
Out - 2008 Jeep Liberty Limited 4x4
In - 2011 Jeep Liberty Carbon Edition http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3972889/2 ... ed-edition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:36 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:24 pm
Posts: 143
Location: Arizona
In my opinion the whole Drivetrain sucks(engine/tranny).One of the reason Im not thrilled with my KK.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 12988
Location: Colorado Springs
Mike08Liberty wrote:
I think the biggest failure with the KK is the 3.7 ... It sucks.

Jeep Liberty - 3.7L - 210HP / 235TQ ... Fuel 16/22

Acura MDX - 3.7L - 300HP / 275TQ ... Fuel 15/20
Hyunai Veracruz - 3.8L - 260HP / 257TQ ... Fuel 16/23
Toyota RAV4 - 3.5L - 269HP /246TQ ... Fuel 19/27

Jeep 3.7 gets a big ol' F-
The 3.7 is a much cleaner engine then the above listed,cost's less to maintain also(no timing belts).Plus those others you listed are based of a car and are in no sense a 4wd at all,they all are FWD with rear wheel assist and no low range.

It's Jeep :wink: ,should have gotten a '02 KJ with the real transmission :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:04 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:04 am
Posts: 1257
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
That list was just for HP and TQ vs MPG comparison. Acura has 300/275 in their AWD MDX and are very close in MPG to the Liberty. I know AWD is different then 4WD but the Jeeps are full time 2WD with optional 4WD. I just think DC could have done better with this engine.

_________________
Out - 2008 Jeep Liberty Limited 4x4
In - 2011 Jeep Liberty Carbon Edition http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3972889/2 ... ed-edition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:49 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Whitmore Lake, MI
It was also due to front impact ratings. The inline six was to long and in the way.

_________________
KK 4x4 auto.- 18mpg
07 Patriot CVT- 30mpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:27 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Columbus, OH
That comparison list (above) doesn't say anything about torque delivery. It's one thing to make a lot of torque higher in the RPM range and, thus, produce a higher HP number. It's quite another thing to make an engine with more torque at the low end and over a broader RPM range, which is more usable, especially if you're trying to design something that crawls up steep, rocky hills. Low end torque never looks as good on paper, because it is generally a smaller number than the torque made by an engine designed with a higher, peakier torque band. Also, the high-torque band engine makes a more impressive HP number on paper because HP is a function of torque at a given engine speed. Those numbers on paper make for good marketing, but don't necessarily translate to usefulness.

-SR-

_________________
2009 Liberty Sport 4x4 - Silver
No mods, yet...

Short Term Wish List:
Hitch receiver & wire harness
General Grabber AT2 245/70R16 tires (as soon as the stockers wear out)
DVD player (for Jr.)

Long Term Wish List:
Lift kit (not sure what size yet)
Bigger tires
Front tow hooks
Skid plates
Rock rails


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:41 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:56 am
Posts: 645
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Well we can all agree.
they could have used a higher HP and torgue motor....

The Nitro has differant motors so we know they work.

Heck there should had beena V-8 hemi optional...
The KK is big enough... It would had been nice.

if I was not cash strapped, i would convert this to a V-8.... but that will not happen.

_________________
2008 Liberty Limited 4X4 Command Trac 2
All stock Auto with 235/60/18


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:54 am 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:28 am
Posts: 10686
Location: Some where in Colorado
Any of the chyco V8's are to long.... The V6 is fine since you save a lot of weight....... It just needs to be a lager displacement V6 with more low end torque...

OR

just sell a diesel one here in the states :wink:

_________________
2008 KK Liberty Sport NIGHT OPS EDITION + GILLS
OEM & Custom Skids - Factory Tow Package - Rock Lizard Skink Super Sliders
Prototype JBA 4 Inch Lift - JBA UCA's - Flowmaster Super 44 OR - Whacked Resonator
Jet Stage 2 - RL Gecko Basket Rack - Custom Winch Bumper - Recon 10.5K Winch
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:58 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:44 am
Posts: 744
Location: Lorton, VA
I hate DC for letting us have our own diesel's.

_________________
2008 Jeep Commander Overland
1999 Chevrolet Corvette

http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/
http://www.jeepcommander.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com