First, welcome to the forum Bill!
As for the cost of ownership, I don't really believe it and I also don't care if it is right. I agree with Boiler, it isn't just transportation, it is a Jeep, a vehicle you can really grow to love because of the options it can open up for you.
I keep vehicles a long time so I really don't care about resale value. I do find it interesting that where I live an old CJ-7 sells for more than it originally cost. That sounds like pretty good resale value to me.
The problem with some of these analysts is they don't know their stupid from their elbow when it comes to off road vehicles so their analysis is based on ignorance and what they write only proves this.
Years ago, there were Jeeps and a few worthy competitors in the off road category. Then 20-30 years ago (in the 80's I think) somebody coined the term Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV). It sounded cool. Everbody likes sports and utility just made it sound so versatile. It was the in thing to have an SUV becaue it made you sporty and having one made it look like you had an active lifestyle even if you didn't. Hey disco was dead, people needed a new way to act cool.
Manufacturers of SUVs sprang up everywhere. All the manufacturers wanted to have SUVs and they associated their products with Jeeps by including Jeeps in the SUV category just to steal some of the Jeep cache. Then they started adding "creature comforts" and over time they ended up with so many compromises that thier vehicles really were nothing like Jeeps.
Since there were so many SUVs that weren't Jeeps and the vast majority of them did not pay attention to the concept of off road driving, performance-based criteria eventually were not used to any degree to rate SUVs any more. That meant that cup holders and "ride quality" took precedent over off road capabilities like clearance and low range transfer cases. Once this happened, real off road vehicles started to get lower ratings in the SUV sector.
Throughout all of this, Jeep built Jeeps. They actually performed off road. They always have, and I hope they always will (I hope Fiat reads this!). Sure Jeep has added creature comforts, but they still sell very capable off road vehicles.
To help save face for these ignorant writers that know nothing about off road vehicles, I suggest we give them a new term for the vehicles they understand. Let's get rid of the SUV term. We can replace it with two names. The first can be off road vehicles (we don't need no stinkin' acronym

) and this will cover Jeeps and the few worthy competitors out there. The writers won't write about these because I'm sure they will find them "icky" or some term they like that we don't really get. The other term for the category of vehicles the writers really understand can be CDGGWBUVs. Of course that stands for City Dwelling Grocery Getting Wussy Boy Utility Vehicle. I think they'll be right at home with that.
When it comes down to it, comparing Libertys to CRVs is about as sensible as comparing lug nuts to pomegranates. Afterall, imagine what the true cost of ownership would be for a CRV that tried the Rubicon trail.
Hey, that's just my opinion. I'm sure they won't listen to me... I drive two Jeeps. I must really be crazy.
