It is currently Sun Dec 28, 2025 6:50 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:19 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:44 am
Posts: 32
Location: Charleston, SC
There have been some questions on this forum about whether a K&N drop in filter gets better or worse mileage than the standard paper filter. First of all, this is definitely NOT a scientific test and I am sure even the newest researcher at consumer reports would laugh at my methods and data. Basically all I did was pull out my K&N filter and replace it with a brand new paper filter (dealer supplied in case anyone wants to know). I then drove normally (for me) for 2 tanks of gas and checked the mileage. The weather was roughly the same during my test with highs from the mid- 60's to mid- 70's and lows in the mid- 40's. I had a little bit of variation in my driving throughout the 2 tanks although there was a good mix of around-town as well as short trips on an interstate. I was averaging @16.5 mpg with the K&N drop-in filter. With the brand new paper filter I got 15.51 mpg on the first tank and 15.45 mpg on the second tank. Pretty similar results for the paper filter but a whopping 1 mpg difference with the K&N.
Although 16.5 mpg in mixed driving is incredibly crappy compared to other vehicles, it does not seem so bad for a Jeep. I guess that each person will have to decide if they want to spend $45 for a K&N drop in filter to possibly gain 1 mpg. Again, your results will probably vary from mine due to all kinds of conditions such as temp, humidity, driving style and driving conditions. If you believe that my scientific method is highly accurate then I have some prime waterfront property that I would like to sell you at a great deal!!!

_________________
2009 Black Liberty Sport 4wd, Aries Brush Guard, Hella 500's with 100 watt bulbs, Tow package, OEM skid plates, Dunlop Rovers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:05 am 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:17 pm
Posts: 382
I'm pretty sure the only difference a filter could make would be the amount of flow it lets thrugh = better mileage. ( my unscientific theory)

that said, there is your trade off. do you want better mileage while allowing more particulate into your engine?

_________________
2005 CRD Limited
added Mopar plates, snow, mud
Detours backbone (w/lp8500)
Skink super sliders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline
Moderator / Lifetime Member
Moderator / Lifetime Member

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:49 pm
Posts: 27226
Location: NOW Southeastern Ohio/ Tanzania
I get better mileage with the Amsoil replacement filter in the stock box and hose to the grill than I ever did with a K&N , and that was after over 25,000 miles with the K&N
Too much dirty crappy air coming through for my tastes

_________________
MUDD'S MOTORSPORT'S We do IFS lift installs ,
03 OVERLAND EDITION /Kilby-Skidrow-Mopar-4XGuard skids/ 2.5 inch TOTAL CONTROL JBA coilovers -JBA Arms/MOABS-31 FALKEN WILDPEAK AT3W / 4.10's etc, 04 Kilimanjaro Edition loaded, plus 05 KJ limited


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:34 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:44 am
Posts: 32
Location: Charleston, SC
Somebody else posted on here that the K&N lets in more air, but the Mass Air Flow sensor compensates by increasing fuel to keep the air/ fuel ratio the same. You get more horsepower from the increased air/fuel mixture, but because you are using more fuel to get there your miles per gallon decreases. According to the theory, when you add more air, you have to add more fuel. Alternately, according to K&N, you get more horsepower and better gas mileage by letting more free flowing air in. They don't mention the air/fuel ratio in their literature but do claim better gas mileage.
I was just trying to find out if there was a reasonable chance of changing the fuel economy by changing the filter medium. It appears that there is but at what cost? A higher priced filter that has to be routinely cleaned and oiled versus a disposable paper one (that has to be replaced repeatedly)? The last time I cleaned the K&N it took most of one day and overnight to dry completely out.
K&N claims that the oil/ cotton filter traps dirt in the air allowing more "clean" air to get into the engine. They even state that as the filter gathers more dirt that the dirt trapping qualities are increased while the air flow remains unchanged.
I don't know but I was curious to see if this worked or not. It seems that a 1 mpg increase is not too bad.
Look at it this way, if you normally fill up at a 1/4 tank (@15 gallons) then increasing from 15 mpg to 16 mpg would theoretically be the equivalent of giving you approximately an extra gallon of gas free based on the increased distance you drove on the 15 gallons. (15 gallons x 15mpg= 225 miles while 15 gallons x 16mpg= 240 miles, a difference of 15 miles for the same amount of fuel). Not exact but you get my point.
As for the increased dirt, the engine oil (and oil filter) are supposed to also clean out contaminants in the engine so they should be routinely changed so that they can do their job effectively. Couple that with the lifetime power train warranty that came with the 2009's and I don't get too concerned with something failing. (I kept all of the paperwork and asked the mechanics at the dealership if the K&N would void the warranty- they said No).
So overall I would recommend a K&N but I am now very curious about the Amsoil filter (Thanks, Tommud!!!)

_________________
2009 Black Liberty Sport 4wd, Aries Brush Guard, Hella 500's with 100 watt bulbs, Tow package, OEM skid plates, Dunlop Rovers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:56 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 12988
Location: Colorado Springs
jon153 wrote:
Somebody else posted on here that the K&N lets in more air, but the Mass Air Flow sensor compensates by increasing fuel to keep the air/ fuel ratio the same. You get more horsepower from the increased air/fuel mixture, but because you are using more fuel to get there your miles per gallon decreases. According to the theory, when you add more air, you have to add more fuel. Alternately, according to K&N, you get more horsepower and better gas mileage by letting more free flowing air in. They don't mention the air/fuel ratio in their literature but do claim better gas mileage.
I was just trying to find out if there was a reasonable chance of changing the fuel economy by changing the filter medium. It appears that there is but at what cost? A higher priced filter that has to be routinely cleaned and oiled versus a disposable paper one (that has to be replaced repeatedly)? The last time I cleaned the K&N it took most of one day and overnight to dry completely out.
K&N claims that the oil/ cotton filter traps dirt in the air allowing more "clean" air to get into the engine. They even state that as the filter gathers more dirt that the dirt trapping qualities are increased while the air flow remains unchanged.
I don't know but I was curious to see if this worked or not. It seems that a 1 mpg increase is not too bad.
Look at it this way, if you normally fill up at a 1/4 tank (@15 gallons) then increasing from 15 mpg to 16 mpg would theoretically be the equivalent of giving you approximately an extra gallon of gas free based on the increased distance you drove on the 15 gallons. (15 gallons x 15mpg= 225 miles while 15 gallons x 16mpg= 240 miles, a difference of 15 miles for the same amount of fuel). Not exact but you get my point.
As for the increased dirt, the engine oil (and oil filter) are supposed to also clean out contaminants in the engine so they should be routinely changed so that they can do their job effectively. Couple that with the lifetime power train warranty that came with the 2009's and I don't get too concerned with something failing. (I kept all of the paperwork and asked the mechanics at the dealership if the K&N would void the warranty- they said No).
So overall I would recommend a K&N but I am now very curious about the Amsoil filter (Thanks, Tommud!!!)

No MAF sensor on the 3.7.

With modern FI you can have upwards of a 80% clogged air filter with almost zero effects on mpg's or power if the rest of the engine(and powertrain) is in good working order.That is how effective OBDII systems are.

Now about more air flow is total BS.Alone more airflow at the intake will do nothing for performance or mpg's.Adding freeier flowing exhaust to that more intake air will do nothing to increase performance or mpg's(though may decrease them).Adding a custom PCM tune with both of those mods will do limited gains in performance and mpg's,and I mean limited gains.The only way to get big gains is all 3 added with upgraded engine internals that need and use those added aspects.Your engine is one big airpump,in stock form it can only pump so much air.Just adding a air filter that flows better will not increase how much air your engine pumps that is where longer duration cams and longer stroke,smaller combustion chambers come into play.


What poeple are seeing in increases by adding a fresh air tube to the stock box is that now the engine is sucking in considerably cooler air and it's fact that cooler air is denser(more O2) which does increase performance and mpg's with no internal engine mods since it's pumping the same amount of air,so same fuel/air mixture but more O2 means more power.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:04 am
Posts: 1257
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
bbo wrote:
I'm pretty sure the only difference a filter could make would be the amount of flow it lets thrugh = better mileage. ( my unscientific theory)

that said, there is your trade off. do you want better mileage while allowing more particulate into your engine?


The K&N doesn't allow more particulate into your engine. It's uses different material and different design to all more air flow. It still filters out the same, if not better, amount of particulate then your stock filter. You don't get "dirty" air into your engine by using a K&N.

_________________
Out - 2008 Jeep Liberty Limited 4x4
In - 2011 Jeep Liberty Carbon Edition http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3972889/2 ... ed-edition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:25 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:17 pm
Posts: 382
I'm not sure I've ever seen any evidence other than anecdotal or manufacturer sponsored trying to prove a particular type or brand of filter media performs better ( both with filtration and flow ).

The closest I have seen is from bobistheoil guy.

Is anyone aware of a truly blind testing of air filters?

I've owned everything from dealer to K&N to fram to STP to .. well you get the picture.

And outside of changing the actual configuration and size of the media, I haven't noticed any real gains from simply changing the type of media or brand.

_________________
2005 CRD Limited
added Mopar plates, snow, mud
Detours backbone (w/lp8500)
Skink super sliders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:43 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 12988
Location: Colorado Springs
Mike08Liberty wrote:
bbo wrote:
I'm pretty sure the only difference a filter could make would be the amount of flow it lets thrugh = better mileage. ( my unscientific theory)

that said, there is your trade off. do you want better mileage while allowing more particulate into your engine?


The K&N doesn't allow more particulate into your engine. It's uses different material and different design to all more air flow. It still filters out the same, if not better, amount of particulate then your stock filter. You don't get "dirty" air into your engine by using a K&N.

Actually K&N's do let in more dirt,been verified by many tests and why they are ment for race apps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gas mileage with K&N
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:59 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:17 pm
Posts: 382
tjkj2002 wrote:
Mike08Liberty wrote:
bbo wrote:
I'm pretty sure the only difference a filter could make would be the amount of flow it lets thrugh = better mileage. ( my unscientific theory)

that said, there is your trade off. do you want better mileage while allowing more particulate into your engine?


The K&N doesn't allow more particulate into your engine. It's uses different material and different design to all more air flow. It still filters out the same, if not better, amount of particulate then your stock filter. You don't get "dirty" air into your engine by using a K&N.

Actually K&N's do let in more dirt,been verified by many tests and why they are ment for race apps.


and of course, the more particulate it stops, the more the flow is restricted ( same as any filter )

I'll stick with my standard filters replaced at proper times. cheaper and way easier than dealing with trying to "properly" oil the K&N and Amsoil ones.

I do have K&N CAI on a truck I have, but it probably gets less than 1k miles a year now. I'm not thrilled one way or the other with it.

_________________
2005 CRD Limited
added Mopar plates, snow, mud
Detours backbone (w/lp8500)
Skink super sliders


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com