DarbyWalters wrote:
That is the problem when people quote the 5252 rule...this engine won't pull 5252 rpm.
1:1 ratio and TC lockup is the key to good dyno numbers.
Diesel World did us all a tremendous favor in their September 2006 issue. They tested 2 power modules, with before and after dyno figures listed, all in rear wheel numbers. They measured the stock 06 CRD with only 1 modification - a Dynamax muffler - for stock readings. Then they measured rear wheel hp/tq with 2 different power boost modules (DieselPower and DP Predator).
They tested in 3rd gear and noted that power/torque fell off quite rapidly after 2000 rpm stock, but the curve flattened out nicely with both modules. The reason I'm posting this is that the figures Dieselworld listed are much higher than those on this thread. They used a company called 454Dyno (
www.454dyno.com - Metairie, LA)
Stock Rear wheel figures 1800 rpm
torque 268 lb-ft
hp 159 hp
DieselPower/Predator rearwheel at 1800 rpm (both modules too close to matter - averages used here)
torque 308 lb-ft
hp 184 hp
All figures rear wheel not flywheel.
Something seems very low on the dyno test posted earlier. Perhaps if enough members of this forum contacted DieselWorld (not DieselPower who hated the CRD) and asked them to re-run those same tests [/b]again on a vehicle with the F37 recall performed on it
and publish the results it might settle the issue as to the amount of power loss.
Great idea, Diesel Word would have lots of clout and it would be hard to argue with those numbers. Considering the nature of the mag, I am sure they would be willing to consider publishing the results as well.