warp2diesel wrote:
Taxing to provide basic Education, Infrastructure such as roads, Law Enforcement, or National Defense is a fair tax that is needed. Taxing for the purpose of Wealth Redistribution as preached in Marxism is Marxism. Wealth Redistribution is like a woman being pregnant, she can't be just a little bit pregnant. When the tax rate is analyzed, one should look at the bottom line to determine if it is better to have the Government or Private Sector to provide the needed service. Taxes for needed services is not Wealth Redistribution, hand outs to able bodied people for doing nothing is Wealth Redistribution. Needed services that do not come from the Government are paid for by those who want or need them, as I do.
People in each City, County, State, or Country need to be proactive and determine what is a needed service and weather it should come from Government, Private Sector, Non Profit Organization, or Charity. Wealth Redistribution which is going to the free loaders at all points of the economic spectrum needs to be cut off. Dragging Corrupt Government Officials, Criminal Executives, or small time free loaders who SCREW the SYSTEM out in hand cuffs on live TV makes a good news story and lets the public know the laws work. Clean up the trash in the house and you have a clean house, the same holds true for a society.
Steve
Obviously yes we need the basic stuff for society - but where does the definition of basic come from? In Denmark we have free hospitals, free schools, free universities, free doctors and a lot of other free stuff. However, if you don't use it you still need to pay for it. Denmark is like one big insurance company - except there is no difference between people with the same income. If you make more money, you will pay a higher percentage of that income. We don't have a fixed percentage, if you make more than a certain amount (40% of the population does) you pay 15% MORE than the 48% in income tax. Essentially you end up paying 70% tax of your last earned money.
They say that an unequal society is a bad thing which creates more criminals. So their taste of equality is that everyone has about the same money in hand. Because everyone can just go to university for free the highly educated people will have to pay back to society the rest of their lives. Actually a carpenter would too because they are making good money. So now they are thinking about upping the limit of when you pay the extra tax because those poor carpenters shouldn't have to pay because that would make them do less moonlighting. Where as an engineer as me can't do that (which I would happily do because the reward is getting at least the double from my work) as my neighboors don't need me to program DSP software for their converter production...