Coal Cracker wrote:
Well, I don't mean to sound like a smart donkey, but I wouldn't want to be his little tractor if he idled me for 8 hours, then hammered me up to 3 grand,,to clean me out. LOL
When I worked on the railroad we used to see allot of wear on the cylinder liners, and see loads of fuel in the crankcase samples, just from idling a locomotive for long periods
By the way UFO, SEGR IS AWESOME! Workin great

You deserve an atta boy
You don't sound like a smart-arse, but you do sound like someone trying to equate a MASSIVELY larger engine that does considerably different work with a tiny light-duty high-rpm model.
I understand that trains HAVE to idle for excessive periods, due to some DOT regulations. At least, that was the reason given when a bunch of residents living near a pre-existing trainyard started moaning about there actually being TRAINS in a trainyard. So there is a precedent for long-duration idling on those. Also, the difference in output between no-load and full-load is IMMENSE, not so with our little CRDs. Even further... I would strongly suspect that the average train engine wouldn't know what synthetic oil looked like if you painted the engine with it. Would a beancounter buy Mobil-1 by the tanker for an oil change on one of those? Highly doubtful. The engine has much lower tolerances than our CRDs do, and the pistons can "wiggle" a lot more, I'm sure. That would easily cause your fuel blow-by, as well as the increased wear numbers, with little loss in actual performance at such a large scale. With synthetic oils, the tighter the tolerances, the better it adheres to the mating surfaces. Conventionals can't do that nearly as well.
I know quite a few owner/operators of trucks, and there are two reasons they might not idle their trucks when sleeping: The state has laws against it, so hopefully the truckstop has those window-mount A/C and electric units... Or the insanely high cost of diesel fuel. Even then with the costs, many were still idling b/c they need the a/c to be able to sleep. Not every driver can afford an APU.
Back to our little engines. Please let's all try to compare apples to apples, hmm? I'm not going to equate my 2.8 liter engine to the engine pushing a tanker ship, yet they are both diesels, aren't they? Is a Ferrari engine the same as the one in a Triumph? Didn't think so.
Thats why I related it to the engine in my Jetta TDI - Close in size, close in function. And I've owned both, and idled both for "excessive" periods with ZERO problems. That Jetta? I usually did 12k-15k oil changes, Mobil-1 Delvac (it was a 2001, so it didn't need the 505.01 oil) and after 150k miles of hard driving, long idling, 30k miles of homebrewed unwashed biodiesel... The primary indicator of wear would be a loss (or at least a difference across cylinders) in compression, right?
Compression test: 490psi, 495psi, 500psi, 498psi. All cylinders within 10psi, and at the TOP of the "new engine" scale for VW's own engineering specs.
If I hurt that engine by idling, tell me how. The guy who bought it had an identical car already, and wanted to know what was wrong with HIS, after driving mine. That's all the proof I need, and can ever offer.