ThunderbirdJunkie wrote:
ThunderbirdJunkie would find a corresponding rearend and run JK Rubi take-off tires and wheels
I should have mentioned a little more on that.
I am not going to spend $1200+ for a JK rear, and then god knows how much more for JK tires and wheels.
Plus I have the 5x4.5 wheels that I want, and if I can't use them, then I wont use this axle. Keeping the wheels is more important to me than using this axle.
Cobolt-60 wrote:
Okay, maybe I am thinking about this wrong, but wouldn't it make sense, since the front JK D44 is wider than the rear KJ Chrysler 8.25, to put 5-on-4.5 to 5-on-5.5 conversion spacers on the rear axle and run JK wheels and tires all around?
Or would the comparative weakness of the 8.25 compared to the "new" D44 make a build like that impractical?
It would be a little bass ackwards to run a stronger axle in the front than in the rear, however I would not use the 8.25 I have here, I would get a ford explorer 8.8 rear with matching 4.10s and LSD. This is my ideal setup with LSD in the rear and selectable e-locker in the front.
jsc7002 wrote:
if that D44 will hold up to want you are wanting to do, I say go for it, but I do know that the new JK D44 axles are pretty weak.
The JK Dana 44 is a pretty good axle. It is high pinion, e-locker, 4.10s, cross-over steering, stronger C's than TJ 44, 32 spline outers, larger u-joints, and a better unit hub. Basically nothing is shared with the TJ D44.
_________________
http://www.Colorado4Wheel.com
"Its not about what you can
DO with your Jeep, its about where you can
GO with your Jeep."
Knowledgeable - But Caustic