Turbo Tim wrote:
Before you do any hacking, you might want to consider what I did.
I made some square flanges got exhaust gaskets to match from NAPA. I then cut just before the cat, and then just after the muffler so that whole stock assembly stayed together. I then welded the flanges in so the stock cat and muffler can be put back in less than 5 minutes (if ever need be).
I then put a hollowed out cat and a Flow Master muffler in with flanges also. This makes it easy to weld as it all comes out.
This arrangement will pass the visual SMOG inspection if it ever happens. I chose the 70 series Flow Master because there is nothing to blow out over time. We use these on our off road cars as well over the Magnaflow and other brands.
Let us know what you do.
Turbo Tim, thanks for the advice. At the moment, I think I'm going to keep the cat, as most people (including now, GDE) believe it to be generally non-restrictive. Besides, I can only, in good conscience, circumvent so many EPA regulations. I'm going for max mpg not only to save a little cash, but to decrease my own levels of pollution. I can understand the SEGR (or GDE's version of it, which I will soon have), because the mpg gains are significant enough to offset a minor increase in exhaust pollution.
However, I have yet to see anyone gain more than 2-3 mpg by replacing their exhaust, be it a straight pipe, cat back, gutted cat, or simply a new muffler. All seem to yield approximately the same results in the long run - dependent upon, of course, driving style. Gutting or removing the cat doesn't appear to yield much in the way of mpg, only noise and pollutants (see Darby's post).
From a monetary standpoint, gutting the cat, removing it, or installing a catback system makes little sense as well. I've spent the better part of today trolling through other exhaust threads to come to this conclusion. There seems to be an insignificant difference between any of the aforementioned options... all that is really needed is removing the exhaust brake *cough* muffler. I cannot, therefore, justify spending $300+ on a catback or legal secondary system when I could spend around $100 (parts/install) and get the same results.
Make sense? Thanks again for your advice!