|
Hi Joe,
Great reply. There's always more to it than you first think. I assumed the TC had to be removed from the flywheel before it could be removed to access the rear main seal. The TC would then be a "loose" part so it would not be any extra work for the dealer to substitute another TC on reassembly. Now you have enlightened me that while the TC is "disconnected" from the flywheel, it remains connected to the trans when doing a rear main seal. So, what I thought would be no extra work to substitute a new TC, really is, at least a little. However, if the new TC does not mate with pump, cover, and seal, that's where there is going to be a huge problem.
In our case, I have the work order for the F37 on our '05 (done in Dec '06) and CLEARLY they only replaced the TC, not the pump, etc. I have obtained a VIP report on Keith's '05. The F37 on his was done over a year later (Feb '08) and it simply lists, "21F37182-CSN#F37-Replace Torque Convert". Unless that extended code means something, I assume it is unclear whether JUST the TC was replaced at that time, or also the pump, etc. The VIP lists the dealer so I suppose it may be possible for them to come up with the detailed work order, assuming, of course, they are still in business. (Keith got no records with this rig.)
So the question is, given the relatively recent date the recall was done on Keith's, would the dealer have HAD to have replaced the pump, etc., because the only TC they could have obtained at that time would have required it? If so, this would account for why Keith found the install of the new "euro" TC to be such a "snap".
My obvious concern is that a very different situation may present itself when our '05 is opened up. The dealer has told me that if they find a "problem" with the pump, etc., they will have no problem replacing it under warranty. However, you have clarified for me that while doing a "normal" rear main seal repair, they would not even touch the mating of the TC with trans/seal/pump, etc., and therefore any of this would simply be a non-issue. So, if they have to take apart something they normally would not when doing a rear main, that's when the bill will undoubtedly jump from $100 to $1000.
I'll try to contact the dealer who worked on Keith's if folks think that may be the only way to be as certain as possible before moving ahead.
Thanks again,
DOC
PS: Is there anyway to tell if when mating a "new" TC to an "old" cover whether it is going to leak, without fully reassembling and driving the vehicle? Also, what is the DCJ procedure to determine if there is a "leak" upon initial inspection? I assume that if a leak is found at that point, it should be a warranty item, but if it leaks with the "new" TC supplied by me, that would be "my" problem and be on "my" nickel.
BTW, does a leak mean less than optimum pressure in some part of the Trans/TC? (I know virtually zip about automatics, though I'm good with old Hewlands.)
_________________ 2005 KJ CRD Ltd Detroit TrueTrac Bilsteins G2 GDE "HOT" ECU GDE TCM "Tow Tune" "euro" TC SEGR Weeks Elbow New HG at 130K ARPs Clean CAT aFe Filter Magnaflow Exhaust EHM Cumminos In-Tank Lift Pump Hayden Fan Clutch Nylon Fan VH Enabled with GDE lower shutoff point Recalibrated Temp Gauge Tekonsha Prodigy Sears P-1 ZDDP
|