It is currently Mon Jan 12, 2026 5:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: why so many crd throw rods?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:41 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:02 pm
Posts: 607
geordi wrote:
How is EGR the reason for the failures? Engine #1 had an egr for less than 30k miles, because the original owner had it replaced TWICE during the 30k he owned the thing. I disabled it in the first week I owned the Jeep, electrically. It never opened again, and I further disabled it when I blocked the pipes after engine #1 failed at 60k miles.

Engine #2 was installed with unknown prior EGR usage at 60k miles, with 60k miles on it. So for the sake of argument, lets assume that it had a fully functional EGR until it was installed in my engine bay. Engine #2 then ran without any EGR at all for another 60k miles, to a total of 134k miles on the chassis... And bang.

Something else is happening here. I was religious about the oil changes, doing them MORE than was needed. The top of the engine was spotless when I pulled it apart, no sludge anywhere. There is another reason for this to keep happening, and I believe dirty oil isn't it either.



Man when I read stuff like this it really makes be want to trade my 140,000 mile jeep in on something/anything Now!!

_________________
-05 Dark Khaki Limited CRD. GDE ECO tune. In-tank lift pump, Transgo doo doo kit, B&M trans cooler, replaced trans solenoid pack and filters, Newer Michelin tires, Timing belt with all related parts replaced at 110,000miles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why so many crd throw rods?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:02 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:14 pm
Posts: 431
Location: RTP, NC
but with a gas engine there is less soot in the oil..
the compression is less so the force is less from the fuel ignition..
so we have a larger mass compressing the fuel and a larger force pushing the piston back..
all this must be handled but the rods, rod bearings and the crank..
while speed might not be as high a a V8 the extra mass is not a linear function.
sudden changes in RPM increase the forces.

lets not forget about harmonics..an inline 4 has more/different that a V8..both are more than a flat 6(Gold Wing 1500), inline 6(cummins) or a V12..
my truck redlines at 3200..but I know guy that push it to 4k without any problems but not all the time..
using boost numbers well over the factor limits..like 3x..but was the cummis designed and built to its limit..don't think so..was are VM..I think its closer


will we ever know the real reason..I don't think so..too many factors involved

-dkenny

_________________
84 BB school bus, DD8.2L turbo ->the transmission died..too expensive to fix..it'll be heading to the scrap yard..:(4/11)..Bus gone to Scarp 8/23/11 :(
06 Liberty CRD
'99 dodge ram 2500 quad cab, 4x4, 24v
all Biodiesel powered when its warm enough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why so many crd throw rods?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:20 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:28 pm
Posts: 103
Quote:
but with a gas engine there is less soot in the oil..


yup true

Quote:
the compression is less so the force is less from the fuel ignition..


uhhh no.

The higher compression and the fact that it's a diesel makes it easier on the rod bolts.

When the piston goes down, and switches direction to go up, there are compressive forces on the rod and rod bearings
When the piston goes up, and switches directions to go down, there are tensile loads on the rod (and therefore the rod bolts)

On the compression stroke, these tensile loads are offset by force required to compress the intake charge.
On the exhaust stroke however, there is nothing to offset this tensile load, so therefore the exhaust stroke is by far the worst for tensile loading on the rod and rod bolts.

Because the forces on the rod during the exhaust stroke have no real bearing on what the compression ratio is, the compression ratio is really irrelevant here. (having said that, a component of the compression ratio is the stroke, and stroke DOES have a impact on rod tensile loading because it effects piston speed)

Basically however fast your pistons and rods are moving, and however heavy they are is how strong your rod bolts have to be.

Quote:
from the fuel ignition


I think you're trying to reference the difference between gas and diesel engines here in terms of compressive loading on the rods.

Diesels in fact put much LESS force on the connecting rods during the power stroke.

Gas engines ignite with a "boom" and put a momentary surge of force on the piston/rod/crank.
Diesel engines burn with a "PUSH" that puts consistent pressure on the piston/rod/crank.

the "peak" pressure in a gas motor is much greater than the peak pressure in a diesel.


Quote:
so we have a larger mass compressing the fuel and a larger force pushing the piston back..


True, higher compression does equal more compressive forces on the rod, but were talking about the bolts failing.
Higher compression = more force pushing against the piston
more force pushing against the piston = less force required to stop the piston and turn it around (top of compression stroke)

As I said before, there is virtually no load on the bolts on the compression stroke, and the higher the compression ratio, the lower the load on the bolts.

Quote:
all this must be handled but the rods, rod bearings and the crank..
while speed might not be as high a a V8 the extra mass is not a linear function.
sudden changes in RPM increase the forces.


All things being equal, a diesel has way less throttle response than a gas engine. Any "sudden change in rpm" would be much greater on a gas engine than a diesel.

and again, were talking about throwing rods, which means were talking about rod bolts failing.

Quote:
lets not forget about harmonics..an inline 4 has more/different that a V8..both are more than a flat 6(Gold Wing 1500), inline 6(cummins) or a V12..


harmonics and engine balancing is a very complicated subject. it's true that different engines have different harmonic/balances...

This does however have very little to do with even crank shaft bearing loading, and virtually nothing to do with rod bearing loading.

I referenced a v8 because of it's stroke, bore and redline....

a 6.2L V8 is common, a 3.1L 4 banger is not.

We could talk about 2.5L gas engines though....... do the math and there will be way more tensile loading on the rod bolts at their redline than ours...

Any rod bolt will fail once the clearances in the rod bearing get too high.

long story short. these motors aren't throwing rods because the bolts are under designed. They throwing rods because the lubrication in north american jeep liberty CRD's sucks for various reasons.

Go call George at the vm specialists in the UK... these motors go 500,000 kms routinely in the UK, and are bomb-proof in boats....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why so many crd throw rods?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 452
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
crd260 wrote:
long story short. these motors aren't throwing rods because the bolts are under designed. They throwing rods because the lubrication in north american jeep liberty CRD's sucks for various reasons.

Go call George at the vm specialists in the UK... these motors go 500,000 kms routinely in the UK, and are bomb-proof in boats....


Can you state the reasons and fixes for poor lubrication in North America?
Such as,
1. EGR = problem. GDE = cure

_________________
2005 Red KJ CRD, TOTALED 12-21-11

2005 Blue KJ Sport CRD, GDE, Magnaflow muffler, Destination AT, Amsoil filters, Fumoto, Timing belt and waterpump @ 99,600, 11 blade nylon fan, 2905 hayden fan clutch, EURO TC




Arguing about whether the glass is half full or half empty misses the point: the bartender cheated you.
Unknown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why so many crd throw rods?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:59 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:28 pm
Posts: 103
Quote:
Can you state the reasons and fixes for poor lubrication in North America?
Such as,
1. EGR = problem. GDE = cure


:BINGO:

Anyone with the GDE tune will tell you that just by examining the oil on the dipstick with your naked eye:

before the tune: 500 miles after an oil change, it's black
after the tune: 500 miles after an oil change, it's clean

Also, EGR causes buildup in the intake manifolds (big time)

When I pulled my motor apart (130k kms) my intake runners were like 1/4 of their original size.


This restricts the air through the engine, and causes it to run rich (black smoke, etc)
This increases the concentration of soot in the combustion chamber, and therefore soot getting past the rings, and into the oil


There is also the very complicated issue of oil specs... there are hundreds of posts on this subject on lost.

In Europe, there is a readily available, off the shelf oil that's designed to work with our motor. In north america, there is not. Chrysler speced mobil1 0W40 which is not the same...

The real silver bullet for any kind of engine wear / lubrication issue is a bypass filter, something I plan to install shortly (if I don't break down and buy a late model durango)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: why so many crd throw rods?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:09 am 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:28 pm
Posts: 103
here is a great write up on bypass filters (the write up quite old, but has some good, well written info on them)
http://www.envirolubesolutions.com/pdf/Diesel_Engine_Wear_with_Spin_-_On_Bypass_Lube_Oil_Filters.pdf

this picture pretty much sums it up
Image

youtube video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rKBs6KGcgwI#!

bypass filters have been around forever, but were never really adopted in the automotive industry for various reasons.

oil and engine manufactured figured out how to get things to last "long enough" without them. For the most part, by the time an engine in a car wears out, nobody cares because the car is junk anyway. What's a 1997 car with 300,000 miles on it worth right now? does anyone really care how well it runs? It had a good run...

But when there is value in having an engine last for 1,000,000 miles or more, companies use them all the time.

For example, this is a cat c13. A very popular commercial heavy truck engine.

http://www.cat.com/cda/files/2202664/7/ ... 0HR0P2.pdf

if you read the specs, or just look at the engine, out of the box, it has 2 filters: full flow and bypass

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com