tjkj2002 wrote:
Have you taken your altitude? That factor could be what's messing you up.
The higher you go the less dense the air is,regardless of turbo or not your always sucking in(or boosting less) air at 6500' then sea level and the MAF(MAP for us gasser KJ's) will reflect that in what they are sending the PCM.
This could definitely be it but I am running more boost than the stock tune does at sea level.
Sir Sam wrote:
If you use the DRBIII to read the MAF it only generates a voltage reading, and never reports what the flow actually is.
This is in contrast to nearly ever other sensor, the analog (typically 0-5v) voltage is displayed, along with the engineering units. The ECU analog input has a calibration table in it relative to the sensor type, however since the DRBIII cannot display the engineer units it makes me wonder if the ECU actually has this table, and if it just looks at a raw voltage level to determine EGR control.
I think you should look at the MAP value, which is used for engine control, and then calculate flow off of that, IAT is an available data point(twice actually). If you can grab the data for CSV and do the math you should be good.
Regardless of what the flow is some map in the ECU(boost limiter?) should contain the surge map, the ecu should be keeping the turbo out of the surge region.
I believe the ecu does use flow rate in mg/second based on the maps that control the egr/fcv.
Would IAT and boost tell you flow though? I mean you could estimate but it doesn't really tell you how fast it's moving through the motor. If you had one motor that flows well and one that doesn't, you could have the same boost but one would move more air.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk