It is currently Sun Nov 08, 2026 8:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:46 pm
Posts: 1195
DaveKJ02 wrote:
TheJawsOfDeath wrote:
I've put CAI's on my last 3 vehicles and noticed a performance benefit in each instance (2 VW GTI's and a Dodge Stealth RT/TT). Yes they draw in more cold air than stock. As far as $ per HP I really dont give a crap, do it if you want. However, the fact that my Jeep is going to see muddy, wet, dusty, dirty conditions, I like the fact that the stock intake will keep that stuff out. The snorkel bit where It places the actual air inlet as high as possible is a great idea I think. I'm going to throw a K&N panel filter in my stock box and call it good.


I wasnt dismissing CAI overall-on some vehicles they can make a significant difference. Fact is, for the KJ it's only a 1.8% (peak gain. The again, as someone pointed out, there's always NO2. :roll:


Just changing the air intake on most vehicles doesn't make much difference. To make more power, you need to get more air and fuel through the entire system, and it has to be efficient. It takes correct combinations to make significant differences.

Nitrous isn't exactly easy if you want to put more than around an extra 40-45 hp to the ground. Even a 100 hp shot on a stock motor and stock programming with colder plugs won't do it. Also, the 3.7 can't handle N2O very well. 3rd gear is really difficult for it. You also need an RPM window switch or when you hit the rev limiter, and then a slow shift, it could grenade. The rings are too high on the pistons which causes the ring land to chunk off. The head gasket blows pretty easily too. There is also the problem of the intake manifold not getting an even mix of N2O, air, and fuel to the cylinders which causes the front cylinders to run leaner than the rears unless you go with direct porting at each injector. You'll need to have the torque management deleted from your PCM also.

_________________
June 2001 Liberty Limited 4X4
Frankenlift II Premium, Al's Upper Arms, 245/75R16 C Silent Armors on Moabs, RL Skink Super Sliders, Rear DTT, Riddler Diff Cover, Fastman Throttle Body, Profinish-Proglass Hood, Borla Dual Outlet Exhaust, TransGo Reprogramming Kit, APS Stall Converter, 4.10 Gears, B&G Chrysler PCM, Lots of Line-X, etc...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:48 am 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Posts: 258
Location: DeTrOiT
As I read this discussion I was curious as to when the gains are noticeable with a CAI. For instance the K&N CAI graphs gains when RPM's hit 3K+. To tell you the truth I really try to keep the KJ under 3K. With that in mind I do like the sound of the CAI though. Nice and throaty with a little Ka-Chow!

_________________
<b>--PHIL--</b>
<i>(Lift, Wheels, Tires, Skids, U Know...)</i>
<b>L.O.S.T MID-WEST MEMBER #057522 </b>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:56 am
Posts: 305
Quote:
As I read this discussion I was curious as to when the gains are noticeable with a CAI. For instance the K&N CAI graphs gains when RPM's hit 3K+. To tell you the truth I really try to keep the KJ under 3K. With that in mind I do like the sound of the CAI though. Nice and throaty with a little Ka-Chow!


Both of my VW's gained more top-end power. The Stealth seemed to breathe better all over the rpm range. One thing people dont think about is how cold air intakes can alter your power delivery. The general size and shape of intake system determine this I think. That one that splits and has a filter on each side of the throttle body would behave much differently than, for example, the AEM style which tends to be long, and stick the filter in a corner of your engine bay.

I think you would generally see more low end power with a short intake path, and more high end power with a long one. One of my VWs was naturally aspirated (VR6 GTI) and the other was turbo (1.8t). Both had AEM style CAI's, which in both instances seemed to shift their powerband up the RPM range. Especially on the 1.8t, I actually seemed to lose some low end torque. The factory design, I believe, is optimal in many ways. I probably gained more power overall, but it was in a place that I didnt go as much, i.e. more toward redline. The 1.8t had a bunch of torque low in the RPM's, not unlike a KJ...

I DO like a lot of intake noise, though. I love that throaty sound. I am considering a CAI, if just to hear more of my engine. If anyone with a CAI wants to post a sound clip or video I'd be incredibly grateful!

_________________
2006 Sport 4X4, Deep Beryl Green, NSG370, NV241J, Lifted with OME 927/948 and Bilstein, JBA 4.5 UCA's, Custom 3" Rear Y-Link Extension and Swaybar Relocation, 265/75-16 Toyo Open Country AT2 tires, Black Plastidipped bumpers, flares, and doors, Pioneer speakers, Alpine head unit, 1200w Phoenix Gold Amp, 12" Dayton Reference sub.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:21 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 2247
Location: Woodward Ave
TheJawsOfDeath wrote:
I think you would generally see more low end power with a short intake path, and more high end power with a long one.


This actually is exactly the oppisite of what happens.


Long Intake runners - More Torque

Short Intake runners - More HP (higher up in the RPM range)

_________________
02 Liberty Limited
Silver Outside & Taupe Inside
Heated Seats, Sunroof & Infinity speakers
USA Spec I-Pod adaptor, Mopar Sub, Garmin GPS
Tow Package, Select-Trac
Rock Rails, Tow Hooks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:52 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:56 am
Posts: 305
I know that as far as the intake manifold itself goes, yes short = hp and long = torque. Im sure that things are acting differently in the intake thats ahead of the throttle body, though.

EDIT

I think this is the best compromise as far as air intakes go. http://www.autoanything.com/air-intakes/60A1849A0A0.aspx It keeps the stock airbox and replaces the filter and tube thats between the airbox and throttle body. However all you'd really be eliminating is the accordion section thats right next to the airbox...I dont think the stock setup is all that restrictive. Maybe its best left alone.[/quote]

_________________
2006 Sport 4X4, Deep Beryl Green, NSG370, NV241J, Lifted with OME 927/948 and Bilstein, JBA 4.5 UCA's, Custom 3" Rear Y-Link Extension and Swaybar Relocation, 265/75-16 Toyo Open Country AT2 tires, Black Plastidipped bumpers, flares, and doors, Pioneer speakers, Alpine head unit, 1200w Phoenix Gold Amp, 12" Dayton Reference sub.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com