It is currently Sun Nov 08, 2026 8:45 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: We are not the only ones
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:24 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:19 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Mineola, Texas
Seems Toyota is having a ball joint recall of 533,000 SUV's and pickup for balljoint problems.

_________________
Smitty
White 05 4x4 Limited
Full Mopar Skids, Hitch & Hooks
Rock Rails
Trac-Lock
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:59 pm 
Offline
Forum Admin
Forum Admin

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Fall River,MA
:shock:

_________________
PETE
ADMINISTRATOR
L.O.S.T. 4 LIFE
04 COLUMBIA ED. & 04 SPORT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:13 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:56 am
Posts: 305
darn, more than half a million! Anyone know the total number of Jeeps affected by the BJ recall?

_________________
2006 Sport 4X4, Deep Beryl Green, NSG370, NV241J, Lifted with OME 927/948 and Bilstein, JBA 4.5 UCA's, Custom 3" Rear Y-Link Extension and Swaybar Relocation, 265/75-16 Toyo Open Country AT2 tires, Black Plastidipped bumpers, flares, and doors, Pioneer speakers, Alpine head unit, 1200w Phoenix Gold Amp, 12" Dayton Reference sub.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:16 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 1066
Location: Bel Air, Md
I believe it was a little over 800,000.

_________________
David
Bel Air,Md
2003 KJ Patriot Blue Sport w/mods R.I.P.
2005 Wrangler Unlimited not so stock
L.O.S.T. #082670
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/803306
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2399643
More mods planned than money.
-----------------

"Roads, where we're going we don't need roads."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:24 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 2247
Location: Woodward Ave
The Toyota recall was on the large SUV (Sequoia?) but as I was reading the article it also mentioned the word "trucks." I assumed they were refering to the SUV with the word, but couldn't be for sure.

As Toyota grows globally - they will have more recalls.

_________________
02 Liberty Limited
Silver Outside & Taupe Inside
Heated Seats, Sunroof & Infinity speakers
USA Spec I-Pod adaptor, Mopar Sub, Garmin GPS
Tow Package, Select-Trac
Rock Rails, Tow Hooks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:15 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 8052
Location: Kentuckeeee
I dont understand why they cannot get that part right? Whats the big deal? Chevy's had recalls, DC, Toyota.. Why can they not make them serviceable??!?!?! :evil:

_________________
LOST KJ'S
Where are you going???
Current Jeep: 2004 Jeep Liberty
-Atlantic Blue
-Air Ride Rear Suspension ; OME/Rustys Lift ; Powertrax Locker ; Moog Lower Ball-Joints ; 245/70/16 Yokohama Geolander A/T-S's on MOABS ; Flowmaster 50 SUV
Lost #007082
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jeepjeepster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:27 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 89
Location: North Olmsted, Ohio
Several reasons why things like this happen:

-Under engineering
-engineering to a price point
-engineering to a vehicle gross weight (fuel mileage concerns, etc.)
-forced price reductions, low price point forced on supplier
-insufficient testing(see first point) to save money, time and/or both.
-rising price of steel/fuel/labor/etc. - got to save somewhere...

As a great chef used to say "I guarantee" some or all of these will be at the root of these problems. And almost all of them in some way come back to $.

I'm a unit manager for a tier one supplier - I live it everyday.

_________________
L.O.S.T. #050943
2002 Liberty Sport 4x4, Black
K&N FIPK, Drain pipe ram air
235/70-16 A/T Revo
Optima red top
Rancho RS5000, no lift
Hidden Hitch w/Yakima Bighorn 4 bike rack
Vent shades and deflector.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:23 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 8052
Location: Kentuckeeee
Wahoo650 wrote:
Several reasons why things like this happen:

-Under engineering
-engineering to a price point
-engineering to a vehicle gross weight (fuel mileage concerns, etc.)
-forced price reductions, low price point forced on supplier
-insufficient testing(see first point) to save money, time and/or both.
-rising price of steel/fuel/labor/etc. - got to save somewhere...

As a great chef used to say "I guarantee" some or all of these will be at the root of these problems. And almost all of them in some way come back to $.

I'm a unit manager for a tier one supplier - I live it everyday.


I know they cannot save money by cutting back on costs, then having a recall b/c they cut costs.

_________________
LOST KJ'S
Where are you going???
Current Jeep: 2004 Jeep Liberty
-Atlantic Blue
-Air Ride Rear Suspension ; OME/Rustys Lift ; Powertrax Locker ; Moog Lower Ball-Joints ; 245/70/16 Yokohama Geolander A/T-S's on MOABS ; Flowmaster 50 SUV
Lost #007082
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jeepjeepster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:19 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:19 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Mineola, Texas
Found out this is their second recall on ball joints. The first was on earlier models involving over 700,000 vehicles.

_________________
Smitty
White 05 4x4 Limited
Full Mopar Skids, Hitch & Hooks
Rock Rails
Trac-Lock
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:14 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:29 am
Posts: 377
Wahoo650 wrote:
Several reasons why things like this happen:

-Under engineering
-engineering to a price point
-engineering to a vehicle gross weight (fuel mileage concerns, etc.)
-forced price reductions, low price point forced on supplier
-insufficient testing(see first point) to save money, time and/or both.
-rising price of steel/fuel/labor/etc. - got to save somewhere...

As a great chef used to say "I guarantee" some or all of these will be at the root of these problems. And almost all of them in some way come back to $.

I'm a unit manager for a tier one supplier - I live it everyday.


Don't forget

- removing the ability to regrease them like in the KJ = real dumb idea

_________________
2002 Liberty Limited
2.5" Rusty's Coil Lift + OME 927 springs + 1/4" spacers
265x70 Revos
Warn 4x Floods
ARB bumper
TeraFlex extended front bumpstops
Rock Lizard Skink Super Sliders
Bosch Size 86 battery
Jeepin by Al's 4.5 UC Arms
Kryptonite Differential Cover
JBA Bolt on KJ Tri-Angulated 4 Link


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:46 pm 
Offline
This member has been Banned

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2301
Location: Harahan LA (the burbs)
Jeepjeepster wrote:
I dont understand why they cannot get that part right? Whats the big deal? Chevy's had recalls, DC, Toyota.. Why can they not make them serviceable??!?!?! :evil:



I talked to "my mechanic" about the LBJ problem and he said that it had to do with the way they were being installed
I am not sure exactly how he explained it but it had to do with the ball end should have thee weight pushing down on it not pulling it out of the socket
I think he said that they should do that as well as add a zerk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:50 pm 
Offline
This member has been Banned

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2301
Location: Harahan LA (the burbs)
here ya go
look at the pic and see the LBJ note that the lower A arm has the weight on it
now look back at the LBJ see what is wrong?
every day the LBJ is holding the weight of the rig not the rig sitting on it

Image

it is very easy to make it work on paper but in the real world it is not so easy
this is just poor engineering on there part
I can not speak for others but I can see the problem with the KJ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:51 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:52 am
Posts: 3442
Location: Columbus, Ohio. USA
jason thompson wrote:
Jeepjeepster wrote:
I dont understand why they cannot get that part right? Whats the big deal? Chevy's had recalls, DC, Toyota.. Why can they not make them serviceable??!?!?! :evil:



I talked to "my mechanic" about the LBJ problem and he said that it had to do with the way they were being installed
I am not sure exactly how he explained it but it had to do with the ball end should have thee weight pushing down on it not pulling it out of the socket
I think he said that they should do that as well as add a zerk


Another way to discribe it would be. The weight of the vehicle is pulling the ball joint appart instead of pushing it together :!:

_________________
Atlantic Blue 06 CRD Limited (his)
Joined by a 2000 XJ Classic (hers)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:07 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 8052
Location: Kentuckeeee
That is exactly right jason. Would of it cost more if the engineer that thought to make it that way, would of made it a different way. Probably not. Look at the WK.. The joints are made the other way on it. There are some really stupid people out there, thats for sure. :?

_________________
LOST KJ'S
Where are you going???
Current Jeep: 2004 Jeep Liberty
-Atlantic Blue
-Air Ride Rear Suspension ; OME/Rustys Lift ; Powertrax Locker ; Moog Lower Ball-Joints ; 245/70/16 Yokohama Geolander A/T-S's on MOABS ; Flowmaster 50 SUV
Lost #007082
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jeepjeepster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:26 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:31 pm
Posts: 1465
Location: Kent, OH
Jeepjeepster wrote:
I dont understand why they cannot get that part right? Whats the big deal? Chevy's had recalls, DC, Toyota.. Why can they not make them serviceable??!?!?! :evil:

DC's product support rep told me greasable LBJ's are just as bad with warranty claims because they don't get serviced correctly. I don't understand this either, my Chevy pick-up is riding on it original greasable LBJ's at 110K miles. Even my Iacocca specials from 20 years ago had greasable LBJ's, which I drove like a rented mule and never had one go bad. Please don't tell me the typical US mechanic is now too stupid to figure out how to use a grease gun.

_________________
2005 Liberty Sport CRD, Lt Khaki, sunroof

Thankful to now be an EX-CRD owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:23 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:04 pm
Posts: 532
Location: Chardon, Oh
So, this is the first jeep I have ever owned, and I like it.

As far as the LBJ (or any joint) being greasable, it's a matter of this day and age.

I am not accusing any of you of being old school, or old fashioned, but when it comes down to it, greasable pivot points are out dated. Jeep has simply been trying to meet the times and using up to date materials and seals.

The reason pivot points don't need greasing isn't because they aren't built to last, there are simply better materials to suit the job. My $4000 bicycle doesn't need the pivot points greasing every hard ride and we shouldn't expect our jeeps to need it. The engineers have begun using bushings and seals and synthetic greade that doesn't require constant baby-sitting.

As far as the LBJ on the KJ's, it looks like it's an engineering problem that someone should have or will be canned for, but I have yet to own a car that has needed anything more than the door hunges greasing (and that is here in ohio with salty roads all winter).

I hope I don't come off as wrong, but why would you want to have to grease a suspension component when you don't have to?

It's a shame that there is such a problem with the LBJ's, and I really do wish that my libby had come with a SFA, but seriously, this is the year 2007. Grease guns were incorporated in pre 1950's technology due to the lack of sealing technology and grease breakdown. Now who wants to help me grease my axle boots?
-Mark

_________________
2008 VW Rabbit- 5-speed 5-cylinders
2000 TJ 4-cylinders 5-speed I'll let you know when I figure it out.
2006 Liberty SOLD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:33 am 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:34 am
Posts: 1150
Location: East Tennessee
Donkeykong wrote:
So, this is the first jeep I have ever owned, and I like it.

As far as the LBJ (or any joint) being greasable, it's a matter of this day and age.

I am not accusing any of you of being old school, or old fashioned, but when it comes down to it, greasable pivot points are out dated. Jeep has simply been trying to meet the times and using up to date materials and seals.

The reason pivot points don't need greasing isn't because they aren't built to last, there are simply better materials to suit the job. My $4000 bicycle doesn't need the pivot points greasing every hard ride and we shouldn't expect our jeeps to need it. The engineers have begun using bushings and seals and synthetic greade that doesn't require constant baby-sitting.

As far as the LBJ on the KJ's, it looks like it's an engineering problem that someone should have or will be canned for, but I have yet to own a car that has needed anything more than the door hunges greasing (and that is here in ohio with salty roads all winter).

I hope I don't come off as wrong, but why would you want to have to grease a suspension component when you don't have to?

It's a shame that there is such a problem with the LBJ's, and I really do wish that my libby had come with a SFA, but seriously, this is the year 2007. Grease guns were incorporated in pre 1950's technology due to the lack of sealing technology and grease breakdown. Now who wants to help me grease my axle boots?
-Mark


Non greaseable is not better or modern. It is disposable. Designed to last long enough to get out of warranty. Quality equipment is always greaseable in industry. Only the cheap throwaway crap is non greaseable. Your $4000 bicycle analogy is severely flawed. A twenty dollar Walmart special is not greasable either. It is not a hallmark of high tech or quality.

_________________
Matt B.

05 Limited CRD. Bought it new. 112k on the clock now.

GDE Eco-tune, rear differential drain plug (drilled and tapped the pumpkin), transmission pan drain plug, Fumoto oil valve, fuel filler neck restriction removed, front hitch, Hayden fan clutch, Sears P1 battery since 08, Mobil 1 5w40, 5 volt glow plugs, DIY timing belt at 109k


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:05 am 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:31 pm
Posts: 1465
Location: Kent, OH
Donkeykong wrote:
So, this is the first jeep I have ever owned, and I like it.

As far as the LBJ (or any joint) being greasable, it's a matter of this day and age.

I am not accusing any of you of being old school, or old fashioned, but when it comes down to it, greasable pivot points are out dated. Jeep has simply been trying to meet the times and using up to date materials and seals.

The reason pivot points don't need greasing isn't because they aren't built to last, there are simply better materials to suit the job. My $4000 bicycle doesn't need the pivot points greasing every hard ride and we shouldn't expect our jeeps to need it. The engineers have begun using bushings and seals and synthetic greade that doesn't require constant baby-sitting.

As far as the LBJ on the KJ's, it looks like it's an engineering problem that someone should have or will be canned for, but I have yet to own a car that has needed anything more than the door hunges greasing (and that is here in ohio with salty roads all winter).

I hope I don't come off as wrong, but why would you want to have to grease a suspension component when you don't have to?

It's a shame that there is such a problem with the LBJ's, and I really do wish that my libby had come with a SFA, but seriously, this is the year 2007. Grease guns were incorporated in pre 1950's technology due to the lack of sealing technology and grease breakdown. Now who wants to help me grease my axle boots?
-Mark

How did Ronald Reagan say it? "I won't hold your youth and inexperience against you."

From experience working around commercial vehicles for better than 20 years and more Ohio road salt than I care to remember, you need a serviceable joint in this enviornment. Fresh grease flushes-out dirt, salt, water, rust, etc... from mechanical joints which if left in place will cause the joint to fail. Using another old-school part, the king pin as an example. One must take the mechanical load off of the joint to force grease through the joint, flushing contaminants to keep this joint from failing. I was most amused by the first set of Rockwell disk brakes used on commercial vehicles having dry, unsealed caliper pins. Those lasted about 2 weeks in Ohio salt before the brakes would lock on the pins and smoke a brake. The fix was as simple as Never Sieze on the pins, slop them up and it's good for @ 6 months. Ball joints are no different, neglect them and they will fail.

As for Liberty's LBJ's, they are nothing short of a POS. My first set was trash after the first Ohio winter (12K miles), second set starting to loosen close to when the recall was done (21K miles), and the new & improved recall set is already starting to knock and showing signs of lane wander (23.5K miles).

_________________
2005 Liberty Sport CRD, Lt Khaki, sunroof

Thankful to now be an EX-CRD owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:45 am 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:50 am
Posts: 1254
Location: Upstate NY
I'll take a greasable ball joint any day. But then I prefer warn manual locking hubs. Ok , so I am old and out of date but i've never had a problem with the old fashioned greasable ball joints and manual locking hubs.

The servicing problem with them is when some idiot puts his pressurized grease gun on the zerk and pumps until he blows the grease through the boot and now it's impossible to keep dirt and water out of there. They're only supposed to be pumped until they expand a little and are firm. I've had old fashioned greasable ball joints last 140,000 miles easy.

There is a design problem but it could easily be overcome with a heavier duty and greasable ball joint.

_________________
05 BLACK KJ - 42RLE & NP242
Skids, Hooks, Bent Rock Rail, Lifted, A/T's, etc.
NY and PA and Florida ONF Special Custom Organic Trail Rash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:48 pm 
Offline
This member has been Banned

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2301
Location: Harahan LA (the burbs)
Donkeykong wrote:
So, this is the first jeep I have ever owned, and I like it.

As far as the LBJ (or any joint) being greasable, it's a matter of this day and age.

I am not accusing any of you of being old school, or old fashioned, but when it comes down to it, greasable pivot points are out dated. Jeep has simply been trying to meet the times and using up to date materials and seals.

The reason pivot points don't need greasing isn't because they aren't built to last, there are simply better materials to suit the job. My $4000 bicycle doesn't need the pivot points greasing every hard ride and we shouldn't expect our jeeps to need it. The engineers have begun using bushings and seals and synthetic greade that doesn't require constant baby-sitting.

As far as the LBJ on the KJ's, it looks like it's an engineering problem that someone should have or will be canned for, but I have yet to own a car that has needed anything more than the door hunges greasing (and that is here in ohio with salty roads all winter).

I hope I don't come off as wrong, but why would you want to have to grease a suspension component when you don't have to?

It's a shame that there is such a problem with the LBJ's, and I really do wish that my libby had come with a SFA, but seriously, this is the year 2007. Grease guns were incorporated in pre 1950's technology due to the lack of sealing technology and grease breakdown. Now who wants to help me grease my axle boots?
-Mark




ok if that were true then why does my '02 TJ have over 14 grease zerks on it and the '03 kj have 0?
it comes down to "target market" the KJ's "target market" wants nothing to do with "service" they want to drive it and if it is needed change the oil

I know this hurts some of the "loyalist" around here but I belive it is true
The KJ was not intended as a "trail machine" but more as a DD and good for the once or twice a year "off road adventure"
if you want to do mare than this in your KJ then you will need to learn to fix it and as of '07 the same can be said for the entire jeep line as far as I am concerned

I mean no offence to anyone by this but it is the way I feel
note also that my TJ new only had I think 6 or 8 grease zerks I added "high tec" after market stuff that had them in it


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com