It is currently Thu Nov 05, 2026 12:34 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Gas vs CRD
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:59 am 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:02 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Bay Area
Dunno if this has been debated countless times in the CRD forum, but I thought I would give it a shot here.

3.7L gas Liberty versus 2.8L CRD Liberty of the same model year.

Who wins the 1/4 mile?

Who wins the top speed?

:wink:

_________________
"It's not what you drive, but how you drive it."

02 Sport in Stone White
-AEM CAI, Borla XS muffler
-Duralast Premium rotors and PFC pads in front (rotors are cool but the pads suck); Satisfied pads in back drums
-6k HID mains, Hella 500 high beams
-Yokohama Geolandar HTS 235/70 R16
-smoke corners with silver turn signal bulbs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:03 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 2:25 am
Posts: 604
Location: Brisbane, Australia
THAT I would love to see.................. great question !

_________________
Custom, Comfortable & Capable.......just the way it should be


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:32 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:36 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Dedham, MA
In Europe manufacturers have to release these sort of data.

Unfortunately no quarter mile but 0-60 and Top Speed.

So here is what Jeep announces for the Cherokee (KJ in Europe):

3.7 L V6 with 4-speed automatic:

0-100km/h (0-62mph): 10.8 sec
Top Speed: 180km/h (112 mph)

CRD 2.8 with 5-speed automatic:

0-100km/h (0-62mph): 12.2 sec
Top Speed: 174km/h (108 mph)

_________________
2003 KJ Limited 3.7L V6
245/65/17 Goodyear Wrangler Silent Armor AT
MOPAR roof basket
front/rear tow hooks
Full skids
75K miles
Average mpg: 16.1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:16 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 8052
Location: Kentuckeeee
Northbee wrote:
In Europe manufacturers have to release these sort of data.

Unfortunately no quarter mile but 0-60 and Top Speed.

So here is what Jeep announces for the Cherokee (KJ in Europe):

3.7 L V6 with 4-speed automatic:

0-100km/h (0-62mph): 10.8 sec
Top Speed: 180km/h (112 mph)

CRD 2.8 with 5-speed automatic:

0-100km/h (0-62mph): 12.2 sec
Top Speed: 174km/h (108 mph)


I thought the 3.7 went 0-60 in 9sec? I know that says 62mph but I wouldnt think it would add 3sec?

I would say the crd would win.. that extra 60ftlbs helps alot.. 8)

_________________
LOST KJ'S
Where are you going???
Current Jeep: 2004 Jeep Liberty
-Atlantic Blue
-Air Ride Rear Suspension ; OME/Rustys Lift ; Powertrax Locker ; Moog Lower Ball-Joints ; 245/70/16 Yokohama Geolander A/T-S's on MOABS ; Flowmaster 50 SUV
Lost #007082
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jeepjeepster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:41 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:36 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Dedham, MA
Jeepjeepster wrote:
Northbee wrote:
In Europe manufacturers have to release these sort of data.

Unfortunately no quarter mile but 0-60 and Top Speed.

So here is what Jeep announces for the Cherokee (KJ in Europe):

3.7 L V6 with 4-speed automatic:

0-100km/h (0-62mph): 10.8 sec
Top Speed: 180km/h (112 mph)

CRD 2.8 with 5-speed automatic:

0-100km/h (0-62mph): 12.2 sec
Top Speed: 174km/h (108 mph)


I thought the 3.7 went 0-60 in 9sec? I know that says 62mph but I wouldnt think it would add 3sec?

I would say the crd would win.. that extra 60ftlbs helps alot.. 8)



Those numbers released in Europe by car manufacturers are the average - every driver should reach that.

Of course if you are a more advanced driver with more feeling for getting the maximum traction to the road and with best understanding of shift points (obsolete with automatic transmission) you could beat that numbers by 1-2 seconds. By the way the difference between 9sec and 10.8 sec is just 1.8 sec NOT 3sec :wink:

My buddy has a G-timer available so I will do a 0-60 and maybe a 1/4 mile run this weekend with my 3.7L ... hope my Jeep will forgive me that - it's a Jeep and not a rice racer....:)

Of course the 60 lb-ft help a lot BUT on the other side there are 210hp!

_________________
2003 KJ Limited 3.7L V6
245/65/17 Goodyear Wrangler Silent Armor AT
MOPAR roof basket
front/rear tow hooks
Full skids
75K miles
Average mpg: 16.1


Last edited by Northbee on Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:49 am 
Offline
clean machine
clean machine

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:52 pm
Posts: 1211
Would also be interesting to see the numbers if both units were pulling trailers of various weights. Likely the CRD would fare better in that test...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:06 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:02 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Bay Area
Hmm, sounds interesting so far...

My guess is the CRD will win the 1/4 mile because of the torque and turbo, but the gasser will pull in the higher RPMs and snag the top speed.


Yeah, yeah, I know and I've heard it from you guys countless times that the Jeep is not a racecar.

But can you honestly tell me that you wouldn't be curious to know which would actually win???

The Honda Civic isn't a race car, but its not stopping all these people from modding it to be faster. When you join a club of people who have the same vehicle as you, theres always the stereo nuts, the speed nuts, the looks nuts, the daily driver nuts, and the gaget nuts --and in our case, the mild to wild offroad nuts. Speed will always be a factor of interest in any vehicle, but for some reason its automatically associated with racing which, while often true, is not always the case.

But I digress from my point of interest....

This case in point is about a race indeed.

I wonder about it because I was actually racing another KJ along interstate 80 here in the Bay Area which started from the Bay Bridge all the way to Vacaville, which is a distance of roughly 40 miles. Weaving in and out of traffic and flooring it when it was clear around the hills between Vallejo and Fairfield.

When I was flooring it, I noticed the other KJ seemed to have a lot more torque to pull. I wasnt sure if it was a manual, a CRD, or if he was just turning off the overdrive and revving higher for more power.

Funny thing is the guy driving the other KJ considered it sort of like a serious race to see who could get to their destination first. He slowly passed by me towards the end of Fairfield and I could see this ugly redheaded stepchild looking thing in the passenger seat giving me this "na-na-na-na" kind of face as his dad drove by. I didn't really care about the race, but I was curious to see if his Magnaflow muffler made any difference in power. This was before I got my Borla however, and perhaps, just perhaps, an exhaust just might have made that difference.

_________________
"It's not what you drive, but how you drive it."

02 Sport in Stone White
-AEM CAI, Borla XS muffler
-Duralast Premium rotors and PFC pads in front (rotors are cool but the pads suck); Satisfied pads in back drums
-6k HID mains, Hella 500 high beams
-Yokohama Geolandar HTS 235/70 R16
-smoke corners with silver turn signal bulbs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:17 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:03 am
Posts: 337
Location: grafton, ohio
I have never raced the two, but by nature diesels are slower than gas. the hemie will out run the cummings, fords v-10 will out run the power stroke. I would put my money on the 3.7, I don't know how much of a hp advantage a diesel would need to out run it's gas counter part, but more than the crd offers I'm afraid. Torque doen't win races, hp does, unless maybe your racing the 1/8 mile or shorter. I think the 3.7 would even take it off the line. I'm not knocking diesels, but fast and diesel don't really go together, thier not made for speed. Diesels are quicker than they use to be, but beating a good running gas engine, I have my douts. I don't even like diesels, thier noisy and slow, any fuel savings they offer is deleted at the pump as diesel cost more than gas. Not to offend anyone, but diesels never turned my crank.

_________________
06 jeep liberty 4x4 65th aniver edition

04 ranger xlt sc 4x4, 4.0 sohc, 5-speed, gibson dual sport, cai, udp, bama tune, BFG's, and tru-trac

07 redfire mustang GT, 4.6 3V, 5-speed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:38 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 8052
Location: Kentuckeeee
Lol, I looked at the 12sec on and thought it was the gasser.. :wink:


I would take a diesel libby over mine any day of the week. I just like torque I guess.. Thats what you need for offroading and towing.. 8)

_________________
LOST KJ'S
Where are you going???
Current Jeep: 2004 Jeep Liberty
-Atlantic Blue
-Air Ride Rear Suspension ; OME/Rustys Lift ; Powertrax Locker ; Moog Lower Ball-Joints ; 245/70/16 Yokohama Geolander A/T-S's on MOABS ; Flowmaster 50 SUV
Lost #007082
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jeepjeepster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:03 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Waterford, MI
Don't get me started on the HP vs Torque theories.

HP is a measure of the ability to do work. 200 HP will always do exactly twice the work that 100 HP does regardless of the torque. It's a function of torque times RPM. 100 ft/Lbs of torque at 4,000 RPM will do twice the work (twice the horsepower) as 100 ft/lbs at 2,000 RPM.

The problem comes in when you consider the transmission. When the vehicle speed is slow (wheeling), or the vehicle is under a heavy load (towing) the tranmission may not be able to shift into a low enough gear ratio to keep the engine at the RPM range where it makes the most horsepower. So that is why it might be desirable to give up some HP for some low-rpm torque in a truck.

That is why continously variable transmissions are so appealing in theory. When they are finally refined and working correctly they can always keep the engine at it's peak HP RPM regardless of the vehicle speed or load. If there was a perfect CVT out there, it would make no difference if your engine made 1000 FT/lbs at 1,500 RPM (280 HP) or 100 ft/lbs at 15,000 RPM (280 HP). Because the CVT would always be able to keep the engine RPM at the engine's peak HP. Both vehichle would exhibity nearly the same performance.

This is exaclty the reason why my Honda S2000 runs 13 seconds in the 1/4 mile with a paltry 162 ft/lbs of peak torque. It is geared low enough to allow the engine to easily achieve high RPM. 162 ft/lbs at 8,000 RPM does a lot of work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:07 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:03 am
Posts: 337
Location: grafton, ohio
"YEAH", torque is great, but I haven't had any trouble wheeling or towing with gas, and I love the snappy gas pedal. Gas excellerates quick and builds rpm's fast. Diesels are great, don't get me wrong, thier just not for me. Gas engines is what I've played with my whole life, from the time I use to drag race untill now with 4-wheeling, I just love gas motors. When I bought my kj, I test drove a crd, it was great, but it still didn't have that snappy excelleration I've grown a custum to with gas and my wife didn't like the noise. CRD's are pretty quiet compared some diesels I've driven. I'm an equip operator/truck driver, I play with diesels all day at work, so I get the best of both worlds.

_________________
06 jeep liberty 4x4 65th aniver edition

04 ranger xlt sc 4x4, 4.0 sohc, 5-speed, gibson dual sport, cai, udp, bama tune, BFG's, and tru-trac

07 redfire mustang GT, 4.6 3V, 5-speed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:52 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:38 am
Posts: 493
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Regardless of fuel price ($2.11 a gallon of reg unleaded vs. $2.49 a gallon of diesel as of today in my area), regardless of sticker price (what was the diesel, 4 grand or so more than the gas version?) I think you have to look at the cold hard fact that an engine put in a vehicle for a very short two year experiment does not bode well for its owners years down the road when work and parts are needed. The gasser wins out. Regardless of track times or towing power..... :oops:

_________________
'06 3.7 sport 6 speed (long live manual tranny's)
tinted windows, cruise, midnight blue
Mopar roof rack
Royal Purple Synchromax in tranny
Royal Purple Maxgear in pumpkins
Full mopar skids, front diff collar
Future mods: Rock rails, B.F. Goodrich all terains. (In my dreams: Frankenlift)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:12 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 2130
Location: Dayton, OH
Image

The Audi R10 is fast, and its a diesel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi_R10

I fully believe that if two engines of the same displacement were made, one gas, one diesel both turbocharged and intercooled, that the diesel could be made faster/more powerfull, everytime. Remember that the gasser liberty's have a 3.7 and the diesel is a 2.8.

Here is why, 1 gallon of gas produces about 124,000 BTU's one gallon of diesel produces, around 139,000 btu's

its just a matter of getting that power to the ground that makes the difference.

_________________
It may be that your only purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others.

06 CRD Sport
Built 5/11/06
Jeep Green
Rocklizard diff cover
V6 Airbox


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Ummm... not exactly
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:35 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Posts: 1201
wendell wrote:
I have never raced the two, but by nature diesels are slower than gas. the hemie will out run the cummings, fords v-10 will out run the power stroke. I would put my money on the 3.7, I don't know how much of a hp advantage a diesel would need to out run it's gas counter part, but more than the crd offers I'm afraid. Torque doen't win races, hp does, unless maybe your racing the 1/8 mile or shorter. I think the 3.7 would even take it off the line. I'm not knocking diesels, but fast and diesel don't really go together, thier not made for speed. Diesels are quicker than they use to be, but beating a good running gas engine, I have my douts. I don't even like diesels, thier noisy and slow, any fuel savings they offer is deleted at the pump as diesel cost more than gas. Not to offend anyone, but diesels never turned my crank.


No offense taken, but many of your complaints about diesels are based on older technology and not on what is in the CRD. The HP complaint being valid, but fixable, however.

My take on the CRD vs the 3.7:

The stock CRD has problems with its software that keep it from pulling right off the line (retards fuel). If you power brake it, then it will eat your tires for lunch-- laying down around 25ft of rubber in 2wd-- with the EPS off, or course. When power braked, It will launch you quite quickly. Otherwise the 3.7 murders it off the line-- until around 25mph. Others have stated that the CRD is about even with the gasser on 0-60 times, My seat of the pants feel suggests that is accurate.

At highway speed the CRD accelerates like a bat out of blazes. With the gasser rental I had, you have to flog it to get it to move the way the CRD does with minor throttle input. The gasser has a delay while it downshifts and the RPM spikes before it starts really moving, the CRD moves right away. Reports do show that the 3.7 will top out higher (on the flats) by a few mph than a CRD, as that is when the lack of HP takes it toll on the diesel. The CRD will always spank the 3.7 uphill, when towing, or at high altitude (turbo vs. normal aspiration engines). I have seen what a CRD going up a hill can do-- there is nothing stock in its wieght/displacement class that will touch it going up the hill. I ate an H3, a Lexus suv thing, several lifted full size gas trucks (Chevy and the beloved Hemi Ram) and even kept the BMW X at bay until the twisties. Those engines have HP, but not enough torque to rev high enough to get to them when under load. The CRD says, no problem... what hill?

My take on Diesel Performance:

Keep in mind the above experiences are with my motor stock, versus the rental libby I had stock. Every performance nut knows that you don't buy an engine and keep it stock if you want performance-- the same is true with the diesels.

Spend $600 on a performance chip and you can take a 5.9 Cummins and beat the living snot out of a 5.7 litre hemi-- even modded ones. The quote above concerning the gas engine options being faster does not hold when you factor in vehicle mods. In fact, then the opposite is true. No gasoline burning otto cycle block modified to its maximum can ever put out more hp or torque per displacement than a diesel modified to its maximum... thermodynamic laws dictate that. The reason gassers are faster stock is because the diesel comes from the factory tuned for efficiency and the gassers for speed, not because the diesel has no potential to deliver. Diesel performance is, however, in its infancy, but is growing at an incredible rate.

The fastest truck on the planet is currently the Banks Sidewinder-- powered by a Cummins at 222 mph and street legal.

The Audi diesel R-10 V-10 is winning every endurance race it enters-- replacing the previously dominate Audi R-8 gaser. It has more hp and torque and gets better mileage than what it replaced. It is litterally blowing away the gas powered competitors. A R-10 led the field that whole race at LeMans and set several records including fuel efficiency and longest distance covered.


The Cummins 5.9 and DuraMax 6.6 are routinely modified to get over 600hp and over 1000 foot pounds of torque-- without going into the block. With fuel injection mods and nitrous-- 750+HP and 1400 foot pounds are not unheard of out of these motors. And Nitrous does not damage a diesel the way it does a gasser. Good luck getting the same hp, let alone torque, out of a 5.9 stock hemi without popping the lid off it and replacing half the motor and boring it out.

The reasons behind diesel's peroformance advantage over gas are two fold:
1. You simply cannot push as much air and fuel into a gas engine as you can an equivalent turbo diesel-- the gasser will self destruct as the pre-ignition of fuel before spark ignition destroys the motor. Diesels are compression ignited and do not have to worry about pre-ignition. The turbodiesel can be boosted and fueled until it comes apart, which in the case of CAT's used at tractor pulls-- means the sickest horsepower/torque numbers you have ever seen from a internal combustion motor of the given block size. It is not uncommon for those CAT's to have the top ends of the engine welded and clamped so that over 300psi+ of boost can be pushed through the block without blowing the headgasket. When the motors run... they sound like a cross between a diesel and a jet engine.

2. Diesel fuel has 30% more BTU's available than gasoline-- meaning you get more power per cubic inch than you could ever get by buring gas. Higher octane gas does NOT have more BTU's available-- it just resists pre-ignition better. Octane has nothing to do with BTU's. Most gas block racers go to some other fuel to try and overcome the limitation of gasoline. Consider that Jet Fuel is often though of as a high power fuel... it is essentially kerosene-- which is essentially diesel No. 1. Diesel No. 1 has less BTU's than No 2 diesel, but it has a freeze point friendlier to aircraft that operate at high altitudes and that is why it is used.

My take on diesel value:

Right now diesel is around .50 cents more a gallon, but so you know, diesel is usually cheaper than gas. What has happened over the past year is termed by the oil industry as a diesel price "inversion". This usually only occurs for a few months during the winter. With the amount of diesels being sold worldwide, it may become normal, however. Even at the current price difference it costs me about 2 bucks less per 500 hundred miles (at 27 miles per gallon in the CRD versus 21 in the gasser) to operate my vehicle. If I want, I can make my own fuel (biodiesel) out of waste vegtable oil for a $1.00 a gallon-- plus highway tax (if I'm honest and don't want to go to jail or have my vehicle impounded). For the $2000 diesel premium I also got a better trannsmission and a better transfer case. Diesel engine longevity of 250,000 to 300,000 miles out of light duty diesel's is the usual, even with modified performance motors that are sensibly driven. You don't get any of that with a gasser. Driving my diesel 300 miles uphill (many grades over 6% and some at 8%) pushing the pedal down on every grade and at an average speed of 80 overall (90+ on the steep uphills) with the ac on and bikes stapped to the back and the inside loaded with camping gear/ammo netted me 21MPG, not something a 3.7 would have done!

My take on "Smelly"

The smell in diesel was sulfur. I say was, because as of the middle of last month it has been removed from most highway diesel per the EPA (The new maximum is 15 ppm versus the old of 500 ppm).

You can smell nothing with the new fuel in newly designed motors such as the CRD. It produces no visible emissions. With the older diesel fuel, particularly a batch of cheap crap... it would emit white smoke under WOT. But never gray or black smoke. No smoke with the new fuel... and no smell in the fumes. It puts out less pollution than gassers with the exception of NOx and particulates... but that is fixed as of 2007. Better emission systems made possible by the fuel change will enable new 2007 year diesels to emit far less pollution than gassers. In fact, running biodiesel-- a 2007 vehicle will produce emissions that are safe enough that you can actually inhale them (after cooling of course, would not want to burn your mouth on the tail pipe).


My take on "Noisy"

Mine is noiser... now that I put a louder, freer flowing muffler on it. Even now, at cruise you cannot hear the motor with the radio on at low volume. At idle you can barely hear it. Under WOT, you will know its there! That is usually the first time passengers notice it. Then they tell me something is wrong with my car... that it sounds almost like a diesel.


The CRD, and other new diesel motors, are not the same old diesels that were designed 20 years ago that everyone thinks are "slow and smelly". You can find more info here:

http://www.bankspower.com/Tech_todaysdiesel.cfm
http://www.audi.com/audi/com/en1/experi ... 0_TDI.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:58 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:03 pm
Posts: 8052
Location: Kentuckeeee
Pablo, you could of just said you like diesel better. We all know a diesel will eat a gasser on hills and towing.. :wink:

How long did it take you to type that?

_________________
LOST KJ'S
Where are you going???
Current Jeep: 2004 Jeep Liberty
-Atlantic Blue
-Air Ride Rear Suspension ; OME/Rustys Lift ; Powertrax Locker ; Moog Lower Ball-Joints ; 245/70/16 Yokohama Geolander A/T-S's on MOABS ; Flowmaster 50 SUV
Lost #007082
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jeepjeepster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:57 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:45 pm
Posts: 54
Location: Nashville, TN
Quote:
"The CRD will always spank the 3.7 uphill, when towing, or at high altitude (turbo vs. normal aspiration engines)."


You're not kidding!! I went from Nashville to Knoxville last weekend to do a live recording, so the CRD was loaded with gear. I put the cruise on 75 and it never moved. Going up hill or down. A small 6% grade in the Smokey Mountains and everyone else was slowing down. Man this diesel thing is amazing!!

_________________
05 Liberty CRD Limited; Dk Khaki
Bridgestone Revo 245/70 R16
Tow Hooks
ipod Adapter

Retired Cars:
86 Izuzu Trooper II
87 Jeep Cherokee Pioneer (317,000 miles and still going, gave it to a friend)
99 Grand Cherokee Limited


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:17 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:03 am
Posts: 337
Location: grafton, ohio
Yeah, I noticed that, when you floor the kj, the tac jumps all over the place like it's in nuetral, then it finally catches. Is there anything that can be done to help these automatics ? That reminded me why I like to buy manuals. As far as the diesel debate, I wouldn't be afraid to pull any of my 3 vehicles up beside a diesel, I could get surprised, but not to hopefull. I test drove the crd, it wasn't as quick as the gas, "close", if the auto in the gas would shift better, I dout that it would be close. It's hard to have it all, you either have awesome lowend and torque, or neck snapping high rpm engine, each has thier purpose, strong and weak points. It's preference, and after playing on diesels all day, I'm ready for gas on the ride home

_________________
06 jeep liberty 4x4 65th aniver edition

04 ranger xlt sc 4x4, 4.0 sohc, 5-speed, gibson dual sport, cai, udp, bama tune, BFG's, and tru-trac

07 redfire mustang GT, 4.6 3V, 5-speed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:23 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:36 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Dedham, MA
Higher rpm gas or higher torque diesel - each has it's advantage. Some people prefer gas some prefer diesel. For me it's gas in cars/light trucks and diesel in trucks. For my Jeep I prefer the advantages of the gas engine - smooth, quiet run, quick throttle response, no smell at the gas station and - if necessary - high rpm.

In Europe (where I lived in the last years) manufactureres like BMW or Audi offer some engines with same displacement. For example 3.0 Liter gas and 3.0 Liter diesel - the gas produces about 250hp the diesel about 220hp but with about 120 lb/ft more torque than the gazzer - AND the result is always the same: The gas engine beats the diesel when it comes to acceleration every time - torque is not everything!
That's the reason why Porsche or Ferrari will never put a diesel in their cars!

The question in this thread was about 0-60, top speed, quarter mile - not typical for Jeep - so the answers could not be typical either! For many things we do with our Jeeps torque matters (towing ....), mpg matters - and that's why the CRD is loved by someones. With the gazzer you also have plenty of torque but you have to be more careful to hold the engine at rpm.

But when it comes to speed, agility, acceleration - the CRD have no chance. Displacement and horse power - both play their advantage over torque .... of course with enough rpm!

_________________
2003 KJ Limited 3.7L V6
245/65/17 Goodyear Wrangler Silent Armor AT
MOPAR roof basket
front/rear tow hooks
Full skids
75K miles
Average mpg: 16.1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:45 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:36 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Dedham, MA
To answer some part of the first question here - I was able to complete 3 runs with the G-Timer yesterday.

Unfortunately I was not able to complete the quarter mile (the straight part of the road we choosed for that was to short) so I had to break up after about 1000ft. The best 0-60 time was 8.58sec the worst 9,10sec!

Here are the details from the best run:

Car: Jeep Liberty 3.7 V6 4spd-automatic transmission
Time: 05:20pm
Temperature: 47 degrees
no A/C, no overdrive, tank 1/4 full, one passenger
Jeep in 2 wheel drive

1/4 mile run broke up at 77.9mph

0-10mph: 0.43 sec
0-20mph: 1.60 sec
0-30mph: 2.90 sec
0-40mph: 4.35 sec
0-50mph: 6.30 sec
0-60mph: 8.58 sec
0-70mph: 11.20 sec
60ft: 2.40 sec
330ft: 6.90 sec
1000ft: 13.80 sec

1/8 mile: 10.63 sec @ 66.8mph

_________________
2003 KJ Limited 3.7L V6
245/65/17 Goodyear Wrangler Silent Armor AT
MOPAR roof basket
front/rear tow hooks
Full skids
75K miles
Average mpg: 16.1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:51 am 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:03 am
Posts: 337
Location: grafton, ohio
Gas ia allmoat allways faster, but you don't buy diesels for speed and thier excelleration is acceptable now, compared to how they use to be. Even though diesels have such a huge torque advantage over gas, you would think that they would kill a gas engine off the line, but that isn't the case, I'm no mechanic, all though I did stay at a holiday inn express lastnight ha ha. I'm under the impresion thet a diesel engine cycles different than gas, some of you mechanics might know what is meant by this, but this is why gas is faster, at the same time, thats why a diesel makes good lowend torque. The way hp and torque were explained to me in laymens terms - torque is 1st, 2nd, and 3rd gear, hp- is 4th, 5th and 6th gear. So at best a diesel should take gas off the line, but they don't because they cycle different. Don't ask me to explain what I mean by cycling different, I couldn't tell you, thats just what I've herd from mechanics.

_________________
06 jeep liberty 4x4 65th aniver edition

04 ranger xlt sc 4x4, 4.0 sohc, 5-speed, gibson dual sport, cai, udp, bama tune, BFG's, and tru-trac

07 redfire mustang GT, 4.6 3V, 5-speed


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com