sleeve84028 wrote:
I thought the Chrysler computers were learning computers... Meaning, it'll learn that the Catalyist isn't there and throw the engine into LIMP mode.
Having an O2 sensor go bad is one thing, but removing the catalytic convertor is entirely something else. Something else being I wouldn't be bragging about it
All modern engine managment systems "learn" to some degree. They are always trying to adjust the fuel/air mixture leaner and add ignition timing. The leaner the air-fuel mixture is, and the more ignition advance that can be run, results in better power and fuel economy. The computer keeps leaning and advancing ignition until a knock event occurs. This helps determine the most optimized a/f mixture and ignition timing for a particular condition. It stores off these optimized values for the next time you experience that same set of variables (throttle position, load, intake air temperature, MAP/MAF, O2 sensor reading, etc). This allows your vehicle to adjust for things like fuel quality, atmospheric differences, and to save them off so that the next time you drive it uses those settings instead.
That learning capability has nothing to do with emissions controls. It will not go into limp mode due to a percieved emission controls problem. It will eventually throw a code and turn on the check engine light.
I agree that the OP should replace his cat. It's one thing to take it off a 700 horsepower 4 cylinder WRX. There is no good reason not to run one on a liberty.