detroit_doc wrote:
It comes down to how aggressive the calibrations (PCM maps) are. If a computer is not designed to take advantage of higher octane (by running leaner and with more ignition advance), you will not see any improvement.
In my experience Japanese vehichles are much more willing to continually attempt to increase ignition timing and lean the fuel mixture until a knock event occurs. Because of this, there are gains when higher octanes are used. American vehicles tend to be less aggressive and thus there is generally no gains from using a higher octane.
The one caveat to this is a highly loaded vehicle (i.e. towing). So let's say the Jeep PCM will only advance to a maximum of 27 degrees of ignition advance. Under normal load it can reach 27 degrees of ignition advance with 87 octane. So even if you put 91 in it, there is no gain because the PCM will not advance the ignition any more. Now in that same jeep, you hook up a 5000 pound trailer. Now because of the increased load, with 87 octane and 27 degrees of ignition advance you encounter a knock event. The PCM detects the event and keeps backing off the timing (and increasing injector duty cycle) until the knock events stop. You are now making less horsepower. Had you been running 91 octane that knock event would never have occured and you would still be running at 27 degrees of ignition timing.
So in a nutshell.... A jeep will make peak power on 87 octane. However under a large load a knock event may cause the PCM to drop back to more conservative settings causing you to lose some power. under those circumstances, running a higher octane will prevent the knock from occuring preserving the same amount of power normally made on 87 octane in an unloaded vehicle.
Now that was a great description that even people that are not that mechanically inclinded can understand too.
Very good info thank you!