| LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/ |
|
| Classic vs. New http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=28328 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | pinevillekj [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Classic vs. New |
One of the cool things about running is the ability to purchase "classic" running shoes. Essentially, if customers raise a big enough stink canceled shoe models are brought back to market. During one of my runs this question came to mind... At your local five-star dealer there sits a kj, xj, kk, cj5-8. Do you still end up with the same model, or do one of these classics (in new condition 0 miles) end up in the garage? |
|
| Author: | Dje Ryu [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd take a CJ-5 over my Liberty any day but, finding one with the same amount of miles on it would be impossible around here. |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Classic vs. New |
pinevillekj wrote: One of the cool things about running is the ability to purchase "classic" running shoes. Essentially, if customers raise a big enough stink canceled shoe models are brought back to market. During one of my runs this question came to mind...
At your local five-star dealer there sits a kj, xj, kk, cj5-8. Do you still end up with the same model, or do one of these classics (in new condition 0 miles) end up in the garage? Depends on the retail price of each. If the CJ costs the same as all the others then no, Ill just buy a good restore for half as much. |
|
| Author: | renegadekj [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
82' CJ-7 no questions asked! (laredo edition though)..Oh how i miss it! |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
if i'm driving it daily, there's no way in HELL I'm buying a Jeep that has a removable top. NO way. if it's a weekend toy, Scrambler or CJ7. KJ or KK for a DD all the way. |
|
| Author: | RAYMAN975 [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
if i could do it, id buy my old 89 yj sahara 5-speed ax-15 4.2L I6 again in brand new showroom shape 0 miles |
|
| Author: | JJsTJ [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Please give me a 0 mile, under warranty, loaded, virgin Scrambler. TYVM. |
|
| Author: | jerseykj [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i had an 89 sahara. bought it stock...then the sawzall came out of its case. took anything and everything i put it through. |
|
| Author: | dloc_jeep_KJ [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
CJ5 or CJ7 but yeah since i DD my libby and everyone i know that has a CJ just uses it for the trail the KJ is the way to go in my book. |
|
| Author: | Blue KJ in PA [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
1978 CJ7 Golden Eagle, brown color |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd like a CJ-6 more than anything else listed. |
|
| Author: | Landy [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The new CJ-5, if it's got the V-6 engine. |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Landy wrote: The new CJ-5, if it's got the V-6 engine.
By that you mean you want it to have the 3.7 out of the KJ or.......... |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
the 3.7/45RFE/231 would be a pretty darn good combination in a CJ5/7/8 |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ThunderbirdJunkie wrote: the 3.7/45RFE/231 would be a pretty darn good combination in a CJ5/7/8
I'll take a 4L/545RFE/242 or a 2.8TD/545RFE/242 With dana 44 front/rear, LSD rear end, air locker front end. but heck, while we are talking about things that will never happen, lets also stipulate that they need to have airbags, and on models with hardtops, keyless entry. |
|
| Author: | Landy [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sir Sam wrote: Landy wrote: The new CJ-5, if it's got the V-6 engine. By that you mean you want it to have the 3.7 out of the KJ or.......... No, actually I just like the CJ-5's that had the V-6 engines vs the 304 engine. The 3.7 in the KJ is peppy enough for my needs. As long as we're dreaming, I wish it got better mileage... |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
since we are really dreaming here CJ-6A with Dana 44s ARB lockers, full coil suspension, no stupid computers, International 2.8 L VNT Diesel (276 Lb ft of torque at 1600 RPMs) with a 6 speed tranny enough lift for 33s/35s or really dreaming .. a FC 150 ....with a Crew Cab with the above engine , suspension etc |
|
| Author: | Landy [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ok dreamer... |
|
| Author: | InCommando [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Up until the AMC buy-out in '71, the top motor in the CJ5/CJ6/Commando was the 225 Dauntless V6. Yep, it too was 3.7L. Kaiser bought it from Buick. Buick bought it back and it became the 231, and eventually the 3800. Those 225's had an odd-fire timing and a heavy flywheel and they were very hard to kill by lugging down the rev's. As the Commando wasn't listed, I'll take a CJ8 |
|
| Author: | Sir Sam [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
InCommando wrote: Up until the AMC buy-out in '71, the top motor in the CJ5/CJ6/Commando was the 225 Dauntless V6. Yep, it too was 3.7L. Kaiser bought it from Buick. Buick bought it back and it became the 231, and eventually the 3800. Those 225's had an odd-fire timing and a heavy flywheel and they were very hard to kill by lugging down the rev's.
As the Commando wasn't listed, I'll take a CJ8 Ya friend of mine has a CJ6 with the odd-fire |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|