I really don't trust multispec atf. If it explicitly says it works for atf4, knock yourself out. But it is not licensed, is it? regardless of the reason, it is nOt licensed, and there is no proof out there that it is better than mopar/valvoline aft +4. Unlike other unlicensed un sae approved fluids by amsoil, for example, in witch there ARE numerous UOI's available that show good to great wear numbers etc.
Considering the price of the m1, vs normal atf +4 witch is like <5 dollars a quart, i would think twice about mystical unproven benefits. I very highly doubt your trans is dead because of your Mopar or Valvoline atf +4.
I would love to see some scar pattern data on atf+4 (witch is HIGHLY regulated to be compatible with the atf license) vs the m1 and amsoil multispec.
ALL licensed atf +4 is the EXACT SAME ADDITIVE PACK. The only difference is the source for the base oils. (all must be synthetic) this means that you can use the wallmart supertec aft+4 and not worry about it. Is the mopar/valvoline base oil in excess of quality vs supertec? I dont know. There's no data out there.
EDIT:
Licensed ATF+4® Brand Names
Advance Auto Parts ATF+4®
Carquest ATF+4®
Castrol ATF+4®
Chevron ATF+4®
Citgo Transgard ATF+4®
Coastal ATF+4®
Conklin ATF-Xtra Plus ATF+4®
Formula Shell ATF+4®
Great Wall ATF+4®
Havoline ATF+4®
MAG 1 ATF+4®
Mobil ATF+4®
Mobil Super ATF+4®
Mopar ATF+4®
MotoMaster ATF+4®
NAPA ATF+4®
Northland ATF+4®
O’Reilly ATF+4®
Parts Master ATF+4®
Parts Plus ATF+4®
Pennzoil ATF+4®
Petro-Canada ATF+4®
Quaker State ATF+4®
Ravenol ATF+4®
Sinopec ATF+4®
Super Tech ATF+4®
Texamatic DC ATF+4®
Ultramax ATF+4®
Valvoline ATF+4®
SAE paper #982674 <-- the development of atf+4
http://u225.torque.net/cars/tech/trans/982674.pdf