Per Terry's original post and earlier comments:
Fulltimer wrote:
Somewhere in the vast recesses of the memory banks there is a thread here about my question. But, I'll be *^%#%& if I can find it!
My limited slip-ed KJ wants to be locked front and back. But she is only getting 1 at a time. Which one first?
Terry
&
Fulltimer wrote:
My line of thinking as far as doing the front first is this: BTW, I could be way off too! Front wheel drive cars get better traction in snow etc. than rear wheel drive. Maybe it's because of the added weight in the front, or maybe because you can pull better than you can push. It could also be a combination of both.
I have a little, very little, help in the rear with the limited slip. Give the front a healthy shot of traction and I'm good to go for awhile.
I have a CO2 tank already so I won't need to buy a compressor. Besides I can use the CO2 for air tools and airing up tires etc.
Terry
If your rear stock lim slip is not helping like you mention, and I bet it isn't, then I'd still get a rear one first for the reasons I stated earlier. But if you feel the stock one helps enough to warrant getting a front first so they can work in tandem, then that makes good sense. I just don't know enough about the stock rear limited slip to say ya or nay about it, but the one time I wheeled with someone that had it, it didn't appear to aid in traction, but I wasn't driving.
tjkj2002 wrote:
Inc wrote:
More reasons I'd do the rear first is you need more traction in the rear of the jeep when going up hill because the weight transfers to the rear. Going downhill, gravity is working with you. Steering is also a lot more difficult with a front locker.
If you play in the mud you will be better off locking the front 1st,rock crawling you need both ends done at the same time.general wheeling the rear only is okay.
Even if your opinions on when you need a locker are right, and I'm not debating them, the facts still remain about my points on when having a rear locker over having a front locker is more ideal.