kevh wrote:
hey i dont care if you want to run with it off or not. i was just reiterrating what i had read (mostly from here) and experienced
i ran a lifted tj on 33s w/o swaybars for years and it drove like crap but was controllable and predictable. took a short drive in the libby (one trailhead to another) with the front swaybar off and it was squirrely as he11
if it was such a "no big deal" item, you would think there would be at least 1 set of commercially available quick disconnects available for the liberty. eh?
either way, the subject has been beaten to death...try the search button
I fully understand that swaybar removal allows an excess of body roll on the road, AND that with the KJ's IFS, this causes a significant amount of camber change (leading to dangerous handling). What I was alluding to was simply this: An ELECTRIC DISCONNECT allows full articulation off-road AND stock handling on-road.
There is no reason to fear the "failure at speed" issue because when designed correctly, the probability of a disconnect failure is much lower than that of any other major suspension component. The reason that no quick-disconnect is currently offered is most likely because the product has not been proven profitable for any manufacturer, including the OEM.
We users of internet forums too often fall into the trap of group-think and miss out on great opportunities. I'd just like to open up some thoughtful discussion on development of new technology, and see if anyone out there is pushing themselves to develop this stuff.