| LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/ |
|
| QUICK LIFT QUESTION http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43796 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | BennyMigs [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | QUICK LIFT QUESTION |
So a few months back I got RUSTY'S 2.5 coils used but never got the rest or the lift. The other day I got a good deal on OME HD struts. Will they work with rear RUSTY'S 2.5 coils? I plan on getting OME long travel shocks for the rear. |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
yes |
|
| Author: | BennyMigs [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That was fast haha. Is the OME 1.5 or 2.5 |
|
| Author: | jsc7002 [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
BennyMigs wrote: That was fast haha. Is the OME 1.5 or 2.5
OME says 1.5" but I dont know of any one that didnt gain at least 2.25", I gained 2.5" from just the coils |
|
| Author: | BennyMigs [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
thanks guys |
|
| Author: | Cobalt-60 [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The truth is that if you take the Rusty's sticker off the struts that are part of the Rusty's 2.5" Coil Lift Kit, they ARE OME (NS131s, I believe) Front Struts. When I bought my Rusty's Lift two years ago, I paid a little extra to get the OME Rear Shocks (NS132s). When I decided to upgrade this Spring, I ordered the OME HD springs front and back and voila -- Full OME HD Lift!!! |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just remember the Ranchos are longer than the 132s |
|
| Author: | Cobalt-60 [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommudd wrote: Just remember the Ranchos are longer than the 132s
Well, he did say he was going with 132Ls. I don't know that I have seen a pic with the "L's" next to the Ranchos, have you? |
|
| Author: | BennyMigs [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cobolt-60 wrote: The truth is that if you take the Rusty's sticker off the struts that are part of the Rusty's 2.5" Coil Lift Kit, they ARE OME (NS131s, I believe) Front Struts. When I bought my Rusty's Lift two years ago, I paid a little extra to get the OME Rear Shocks (NS132s). When I decided to upgrade this Spring, I ordered the OME HD springs front and back and voila -- Full OME HD Lift!!!
Did you see or feel any diffrents between them. |
|
| Author: | Cobalt-60 [ Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
BennyMigs wrote: Cobolt-60 wrote: The truth is that if you take the Rusty's sticker off the struts that are part of the Rusty's 2.5" Coil Lift Kit, they ARE OME (NS131s, I believe) Front Struts. When I bought my Rusty's Lift two years ago, I paid a little extra to get the OME Rear Shocks (NS132s). When I decided to upgrade this Spring, I ordered the OME HD springs front and back and voila -- Full OME HD Lift!!! Did you see or feel any diffrents between them. Rusty's coils are lighter and give a smoother ride, but not as much lift, and they will sag more. OME HDs are heavier, give a rougher ride (at least initially, mine are not broken in yet), but provide more lift and will not sag as much... |
|
| Author: | sharky [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Quick ? is a 3" lift too much for KJ ? |
I really don't want to have to mess with other parts due to the lift, Like steering or brake lines or anything else... Thanks. |
|
| Author: | jsc7002 [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quick ? is a 3" lift too much for KJ ? |
sharky wrote: I really don't want to have to mess with other parts due to the lift, Like steering or brake lines or anything else...
Thanks. nope you have an '02 you dont need to do anything besides the new coils and shocks and you will be all set and some bumpstops, you can buy the fronts and use some hockey pucks for the rear. |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cobolt-60 wrote: tommudd wrote: Just remember the Ranchos are longer than the 132s Well, he did say he was going with 132Ls. I don't know that I have seen a pic with the "L's" next to the Ranchos, have you? I only see him mentioning the 132s not the 132L and yes I have seen them side by side...IN MY GARAGE!! |
|
| Author: | sharky [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Thanks for the info: jsc7002 |
| Author: | Cobalt-60 [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommudd wrote: Cobolt-60 wrote: Well, he did say he was going with 132Ls. I don't know that I have seen a pic with the "L's" next to the Ranchos, have you? I only see him mentioning the 132s not the 132L and yes I have seen them side by side...IN MY GARAGE!! The end of his original post says: BennyMigs wrote: I plan on getting OME long travel shocks for the rear.
And? How much longer are the Ranchos than the 132Ls??? |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cobolt-60 wrote: tommudd wrote: Cobolt-60 wrote: Well, he did say he was going with 132Ls. I don't know that I have seen a pic with the "L's" next to the Ranchos, have you? I only see him mentioning the 132s not the 132L and yes I have seen them side by side...IN MY GARAGE!! The end of his original post says: BennyMigs wrote: I plan on getting OME long travel shocks for the rear. And? How much longer are the Ranchos than the 132Ls??? whatever but still doesn't say Ls and since so many throw incorrect terms around here who knew |
|
| Author: | Cobalt-60 [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommudd wrote: whatever but still doesn't say Ls and since so many throw incorrect terms around here who knew
You're not???? I thought all you OH boys were mind readers... |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cobolt-60 wrote: tommudd wrote: whatever but still doesn't say Ls and since so many throw incorrect terms around here who knew You're not???? I thought all you OH boys were mind readers... Way far advanced than most other states for sure, and we do know what we are talking about, not making it up as we go |
|
| Author: | Cobalt-60 [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommudd wrote: Cobolt-60 wrote: You're not???? I thought all you OH boys were mind readers... Way far advanced than most other states for sure, and we do know what we are talking about, not making it up as we go On balanced, I'd have to agree, and those that don't,.... well they sure TALK a good game... |
|
| Author: | oddball [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommudd wrote: Cobolt-60 wrote: tommudd wrote: whatever but still doesn't say Ls and since so many throw incorrect terms around here who knew You're not???? I thought all you OH boys were mind readers... Way far advanced than most other states for sure, and we do know what we are talking about, not making it up as we go Arkansas does not qualify as most states. But seriously, don't question tommudd's knowledge of what works and doesn't work on KJ's, or his experience on these forums. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|