dieselenthusiast wrote:
Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
Are the world's ice caps melting because of climate change, or are the reports just a lot of scare mongering by the advocates of the global warming theory?
Scare mongering appears to be the case, according to reports from the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that reveal that almost all the allegedly “lost” ice has come back. A NOAA report shows that ice levels which had shrunk from 5 million square miles in January 2007 to just 1.5 million square miles in October, are almost back to their original levels.
Moreover, a Feb. 18 report in the London Daily Express showed that there is nearly a third more ice in Antarctica than usual, challenging the global warming crusaders and buttressing arguments of skeptics who deny that the world is undergoing global warming.
The Daily express recalls the photograph of polar bears clinging on to a melting iceberg which has been widely hailed as proof of the need to fight climate change and has been used by former Vice President Al Gore during his "Inconvenient Truth" lectures about mankind’s alleged impact on the global climate.
Gore fails to mention that the photograph was taken in the month of August when melting is normal. Or that the polar bear population has soared in recent years.
As winter roars in across the Northern Hemisphere, Mother Nature seems to have joined the ranks of the skeptics.
As the Express notes, scientists are saying the northern Hemisphere has endured its coldest winter in decades, adding that snow cover across the area is at its greatest since 1966. The newspaper cites the one exception — Western Europe, which had, until the weekend when temperatures plunged to as low as -10 C in some places, been basking in unseasonably warm weather.
Lord have mercy Dieselenthusiast! The least you could do is change a few words when you plagiarize Phil Brennan and others. These are not your words.

It may be time to invest in a higher standard of intellectual integrity.
If you are going to be taken seriously while engaging in a debate on this topic I would suggest you look at the evidence, read the analysis and then come to a rational conclusion.
Do not look for evidence to support your beliefs. I know this is scary! Depending upon your personality, it can make your world view much less certain and make you feel out of control.
Perhaps you have some questions:
Who's data do you think are most accurate? Scientists or some guy with a six pack and a thermometer?
Who's analysis are you going to take most seriously? Zoologists, Climatologists, Geologists, Oceanographers and others who utilize the scientific method as the basis of their analysis, or a few people with a vested interest in hunting polar bears and drilling for oil in the Arctic?
The problem with global warming is that the system is quite complex and most layman (myself included) like simply answers and specific events to point to in order to prove their point. People loath having to think too hard about complicated things. But this is too important....so even I clench my teeth and do my homework.
Heck, even if you believe the whole global warming thing is some kind of giant scam, you will still have to deal with all the gullible, uninformed people such as myself who are being fooled by the scam artists. We intend to drive change and that change will affect you. Therefore, wouldn't it make sense for you to be more educated on the topic than I am instead of cutting and pasting silly sound bites as real information - and without original thought? Please teach me and the thousands of scientists why their data and analysis is so completely wrong.
Believe it or not, this does (eventually

) dovetail in with alternative energy. Most folks want the magic energy bullet. They don't want to think about the potential complexity that will likely be our future. They don't want to be responsible for their part in it. They just want to get to work in the morning and not otherwise be bothered. Believe me, I completely empathize with that feeling.
But this is too important for me to remain foolishly comfortable.