It is currently Mon Nov 02, 2026 9:31 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Will Liberty CRD Rear Air Deflector Help MPG?
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:09 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:26 am
Posts: 53
Location: Alexandria, Va
The aerodynamics is the Liberty is not great, even so still get 27 mpg average (70% HW and 30% City)

Just installed front air defelector hoping to improve my mpg a bit more.

A rear air defelector costs $98.00 on the jeep site.

Does anyone know if the rear air deflector can help mpg?

_________________
VACRD
2006 CRD
AeroTurbine 2525 Muffler
FUMOTO, SAMCO Hoses
GDE Eco Tune, Euro Torque Con
New Fuel Filter Unit
2009 VW TDI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 5:42 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:14 am
Posts: 134
Location: FL
Is that the thing that directs air down the back window to keep it clean? If not, how about a pic :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 6:23 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:26 am
Posts: 53
Location: Alexandria, Va
Yes - that is what the description says.

_________________
VACRD
2006 CRD
AeroTurbine 2525 Muffler
FUMOTO, SAMCO Hoses
GDE Eco Tune, Euro Torque Con
New Fuel Filter Unit
2009 VW TDI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 6:56 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Austin, TX
The rear air deflector that clears the rear window - increases drag and will decrease mileage
( that's if you see any effect at all - it should be pretty small)

Rear aerodynamic panels that would improve mileage would be around all 4 sides and gradually taper the rear cross sectional area.

something like this
http://whyfiles.org/shorties/190truck/

_________________
2005 CRD
stuff
Skeptic quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:37 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:26 am
Posts: 53
Location: Alexandria, Va
ATXKJ

Thanks for the info. Looks like rear deflector doesn't make any sense.

_________________
VACRD
2006 CRD
AeroTurbine 2525 Muffler
FUMOTO, SAMCO Hoses
GDE Eco Tune, Euro Torque Con
New Fuel Filter Unit
2009 VW TDI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:37 am 
Offline
Biodiesel Enthusiast
Biodiesel Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:13 am
Posts: 169
Location: Denver, CO
I got one in hopes that it could help keep my back glass clean. It didn't do much. As far as fuel economy, negligible difference. I kind of like the look, so it'll stay.

_________________
~James
-----------
Black '05 CRD Sport
L.O.S.T. # 068768
Rock Lizard Skink Sliders, Skid Row tranny skid, Wet Okole seat covers, Black Widow roof basket, front tow hooks, cargo/pet partition, all Amsoil


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 1:10 am 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:24 am
Posts: 145
Location: Roseburg Or
here's a super scientific link for something that might help, but with the box on a box design of the liberty, maybe no.....
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corpor ... 16E_03.pdf

bought a motorcycle from an engineer type who had a bunch on the back of his cube van, he swore by 'em, so I dunno........ :roll:

I'm pretty thrilled that I can get near econo-car mileage, turn around and tow a bunch of weight and/or go out 'wheeling the same day in the same rig. can't say that for anything else out there.

_________________
'05 CRD limited, SEGR, EHM, Magnaflow 18" muffler, OEM skid plates, bug guard, trailer kit, yakima cross bars and basket, CAT filter,
....more to come.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:12 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Austin, TX
This site had some ideas - not many are applicable to Liberties
http://www.recumbents.com/car_aerodynamics/

and this also has good ideas
http://www.gassavers.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4

_________________
2005 CRD
stuff
Skeptic quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:28 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 10:51 am
Posts: 477
Location: Kellogg, IA
The rear deflector was a no brainer for me as I live on rural gravel roads and the pile up of dirt on the rear of any vehicle is a problem. The rear deflector on my Libby has done a fantastic job. I only get the dirt buildup down by the bumper.

Haven't tried checking mpg without the deflector, but since I got 31.6 on my last trip with four adults and cargo, I don't think I have lost anything substantial by having it on.

Most people would probably not have a need for such an item. Those of us that live on dirt/gravel roads find them indespensible. Even in comparison to other Libby owners in the area that don't live on gravel roads, we do not have near the buildup and therefore cleaning problems. We hardly ever use the rear window wiper.

The Libby is a rolling brick, aerodynamicaly. Not sure the aerodynamics of having a rear deflector means anything. I view it as just a tool to do what I need to have done.

_________________
*************************************
Environmentalist Green + Socialist Red = Facist Brown

2006 Liberty CRD, Frankenlift II, Al's A Arms, Moog LBJ's, GDE tune, Etechno GX3123 Glow plugs, Fumoto drain valve, Elephant hose CCV mod.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:44 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 501
They DO work.....

Here's why....

At lower speeds, they force air down and keep dust, gravel, exhaust fumes away from the back of the vehicle. They were originally designed just for dust, but manufacturers in the 70's and 80's discovered that they also work on exhuast fumes. Stationwagons that had tailgate windows that could roll down would suck them in, so they were installed so that the occupants would not choke on exhaust fumes and potentially pass out from CO2 poisoning.

BUT, at higher speeds, the liberty (and any other large "flatbacked" vehicle) creates a vacuum with its passage through air on the back of the vehicle. Air goes around the vehicle, but swirls and cavitates in an effort to fill the empty space near the back of the window. Its a fruitless effort, and the volume of air that you disturb and tow along with you is three times as big as the liberty itself. The net effect of this is that the faster you go, the more air you "pull" along with you, and this decreases gas mileage exponentially. Think of it as a parachute.

What this thing does, however, is force fresh air down into this vacuum, effectively filling it with a large enough volume of air that the vacuum is neutralized. At speed, this creates a large self-replacing air pillow attached the back of the vehicle, in which air coming around the vehicle just slides off on all sides.

Mythbusters did this and proved that it is in fact "confirmed." Also, my physics professor did a similar experiment with a smoke chamber and the smoothness of airflow with it was phenomenal. The pitch (or angle) of the wing can be altered, but most manufacturers choose the angle to be most effective at highway speeds. The pitch the Mopar wing uses is most effective between 68-80 mph, right in the highway zone.

So yes, it does work great. Get one.




PS This is essentially the opposite of a spoiler. A spoiler on a rear drive car (like Nascar) forces air up in an attempt to create more "weight" or downforce on the back of the car for more traction. It does this because the pressure to displace air upward, when it wants to go down, produces downforce. What it also does is create a much larger vacuum in each vehicle, so when you hear the term "drafting", you will know that this means one car is getting into the vacuum of another car, and is being sucked forward along with it! The physics of 200mph, however, dictate that it is more beneficial to create drag and downforce, rather than lift and reducing vacuum drag.

This deflector does the opposite. It forces air down, filling the vacuum instead of making it bigger. The physics of highway speed dictate that an wind deflector would be more beneficial. Technically, it does reduce the weight on the tires, because the deflector is actually pulling up on the vehicle at speed. But at over two tons, I don't think she'll get airborne any time soon!

_________________
2003 Jeep Liberty Freedom Edition
3.7L 5-spd 4x4, Rusty's 2.5 in. coil lift
General Grabbers AT2's 245/75-16E on MOABS
EVIC installed, iPod wired, Hella 500's and Grilles
Mopar Bike Rack, Mopar Roof Rack, Black Widow Roof Basket w/ air deflector
Draw-Tite Hitch, Front Tint, Debadged on sides and front


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:29 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 1137
So how many miles per gallon go you gain in fuel economy with the deflector ?

_________________
2005 LTD CRD RB1 NAV/Htd Leather seats/Amsoil EA filters
SunCoast Mega Trans & Billet TC/PML pan/Aux cooler
Fuel cooler/Lift Pump/10um Pri/Racor R490 2um Sec Fuel Filters
IronMan Lift/Shocks/Provent/Moog ball joints/ V6 Airbox/Fan/Hayden
Cobalt Boost/EGT/Oil/Trans/Volt gauges/Aeroturbine 2525
Yeti Hot Tune/Odessey 65/Samco's/Michelin Defenders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:07 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 501
with a deisel, Im not sure. Deisels are already pretty efficient and the torque they produce can much more easily overcome drag than the gassers (if they are geared correctly, deisels are not designed to rev). The wind deflector helps gassers more than deisels because the torque curve drops off pretty quickly in gassers, forcing that much more fuel to be burned to get the torque high enough for highway speeds.

Either way, its a good investment. It will definitely help towing mileage too.

_________________
2003 Jeep Liberty Freedom Edition
3.7L 5-spd 4x4, Rusty's 2.5 in. coil lift
General Grabbers AT2's 245/75-16E on MOABS
EVIC installed, iPod wired, Hella 500's and Grilles
Mopar Bike Rack, Mopar Roof Rack, Black Widow Roof Basket w/ air deflector
Draw-Tite Hitch, Front Tint, Debadged on sides and front


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:16 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:38 am
Posts: 358
Location: Troy, Ohio
csukoh78 wrote:
They DO work.....
If they do help MPGs, WHY don't manufactures install them as OEM ???

Certainly higher MPG ratings would be more cost effective in light of adding $100 to the base price!

_________________
2012 Liberty Latitude Edition,
Brilliant Black Pearl, Moonroof.

2013 Wrangler Sport


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:28 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 501
Katmandu wrote:
csukoh78 wrote:
They DO work.....
If they do help MPGs, WHY don't manufactures install them as OEM ???

Certainly higher MPG ratings would be more cost effective in light of adding $100 to the base price!


Are you serious? Since when have manufacturers ever been concerned about doing what's right versus keeping costs as low as possible?

_________________
2003 Jeep Liberty Freedom Edition
3.7L 5-spd 4x4, Rusty's 2.5 in. coil lift
General Grabbers AT2's 245/75-16E on MOABS
EVIC installed, iPod wired, Hella 500's and Grilles
Mopar Bike Rack, Mopar Roof Rack, Black Widow Roof Basket w/ air deflector
Draw-Tite Hitch, Front Tint, Debadged on sides and front


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:06 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:48 pm
Posts: 39
csukoh78 wrote:
Katmandu wrote:
csukoh78 wrote:
They DO work.....
If they do help MPGs, WHY don't manufactures install them as OEM ???

Certainly higher MPG ratings would be more cost effective in light of adding $100 to the base price!


Are you serious? Since when have manufacturers ever been concerned about doing what's right versus keeping costs as low as possible?


Thats a fact. You always have to remember that engineering, marketing and the beancounters are always fighting over this kinda stuff. It might be something as simple as the manufacturer that makes the spoiler couldn't produce enough to supply the assembly line. So instead of making it standard they tacked it on as an extra. Just a completely uneducated theory.

I can vouch that it'd help some. I don't think it'll be much, but some.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:58 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Austin, TX
csukoh78

Do you have any data from Mythbusters? - they don't list air deflectors or gas mileage on their web - although it could easily be a subset of another title.

I don't expect manufacturers to do anything that's not cost effective - so the return on installing an air deflector would have to exceed the cost - and if it's a small amount of mileage that would be a hard argument to make.

However there are areas where trivial mileage improvements matter - i.e. interstate trucking companies spend a lot of money on trivial improvements because they are cost effective, also universities and Gov agencies modeling aerodynamics - they are looking at the extensions on the back of the trailer, not air deflectors.

Rear deflectors that go up - like a racecar - or down to clear the window - should increase drag (and frontal area) - although as I said before - the amount should be small enough that it'd be hard to measure.

_________________
2005 CRD
stuff
Skeptic quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:53 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 501
we were shown a clip from our physics professor. The other crew did it (not jamie and the other guy) I dont know if it ever aired, but it was a definite show done by mythbusters. I cant copy it and post it because its encoded on my university site.

_________________
2003 Jeep Liberty Freedom Edition
3.7L 5-spd 4x4, Rusty's 2.5 in. coil lift
General Grabbers AT2's 245/75-16E on MOABS
EVIC installed, iPod wired, Hella 500's and Grilles
Mopar Bike Rack, Mopar Roof Rack, Black Widow Roof Basket w/ air deflector
Draw-Tite Hitch, Front Tint, Debadged on sides and front


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:05 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Austin, TX
FYI - while I was looking for data I found a website

http://www.airtab.com/

tape on Turbulators - lots of testimonials they look weird - I'm not sure if I do enough highway driving to try them.
photo page has lots of examples - even a Corvette that says it helped.

Note - I know testimonials are not data they aren't statistically valid

_________________
2005 CRD
stuff
Skeptic quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:57 pm 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:26 am
Posts: 53
Location: Alexandria, Va
Just looked on Jeep Site. Side window deflectors cost $91 for four.

My front deflector (black on silver) looks pretty good. I think I will get the side window deflectors. I have read on this site that does help mpg.

Looks like the rear window deflector is questionable from a mpg perspective.

_________________
VACRD
2006 CRD
AeroTurbine 2525 Muffler
FUMOTO, SAMCO Hoses
GDE Eco Tune, Euro Torque Con
New Fuel Filter Unit
2009 VW TDI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:13 am 
Offline
Banned For Abuse on LostJeeps.com

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:44 pm
Posts: 1856
Location: Buena Vista, CO
It won't help. Anything that makes more drag will hurt. Maybe less than 1 mpg but it won't help. Only way the side deflectors will help is if you have your windows down a bit. With windows down, it really messes up the smooth air. Car acts like a parachute.

_________________
2006 Sport CRD

Could the Aztecs have known, that in 2012 after a 4 year experiment, our country would cease to exist?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com