Billwill wrote:
Troutman wrote:
Its the auto box that is no good for towing, the torque converter winds up too much, a manual diesel means much better control and economy.
I guess i will just look for a good car...2.5 or 2.8
Just wondering if the 2.8 is noticeably more powerful and has more grunt low down.
The early 2.8 L in the Export market...up to 2004, is basically a bored out 2.5 L and came with Auto box only.
The manual versions as far as I know only came out with the Command Trac 4X4 system as apposed to the Select Trac system on the auto models. The Select Trac lets you drive in Full Time High 4X4 which is good for wet roads.
So if you are looking for an early Export CRD the 2.8 L has more power than the 2.5 L but comes in auto mode only....at least it comes with the Euro torque converter which is the envy of USA owners. Make a note of what 4X4 system you are looking at as well.
I am very happy with my 2002 2.5 L CRD Sport 5 speed manual with Traclock rear diff...much less finicky setup than the later models but if I had to replace it I would go for a 2007 2.8 L Ltd automatic....much better auto box and more power.

So how is the Export type of Torque Converter different from the none export one? I have basically decided against an auto due to experience with my XJ, you really have to give it some throttle to get it moving from a standing start (when towing) which I am not used to.
My XJ has Selec Trac which is great so I need to check on that too.
One other thing: is the later 2.8 a different engine to the 2.5? as you say the early ones are simply a bored out 2.5 and not much else. It is still a VM I suppose
I also noticed the later ones have Traction Control.
I phoned up a dealer today who had a 2006 2.8 Renegade with FSH and 39kmiles for £5995. A deposit had been taken on it so missed out there but I nearly had my first Liberty/Cherokee!